Query Parser Solr , Difference between standard query parser and dismax query parser
I gone through dismax query parser and standard query parser and found the standard query parser is different in handling error and hence more prone to error.so what are the different area in which one is powerful than other and what is the specific difference between them.
solr lucene
asked Jan 20 at 15:12
user3539626user3539626
1714
add a comment |
I gone through dismax query parser and standard query parser and found the standard query parser is different in handling error and hence more prone to error.so what are the different area in which one is powerful than other and what is the specific difference between them.
solr lucene
asked Jan 20 at 15:12
user3539626user3539626
1714
add a comment |
I gone through dismax query parser and standard query parser and found the standard query parser is different in handling error and hence more prone to error.so what are the different area in which one is powerful than other and what is the specific difference between them.
solr lucene
asked Jan 20 at 15:12
user3539626user3539626
1714
I gone through dismax query parser and standard query parser and found the standard query parser is different in handling error and hence more prone to error.so what are the different area in which one is powerful than other and what is the specific difference between them.
solr lucene
solr lucene
asked Jan 20 at 15:12
user3539626user3539626
1714
asked Jan 20 at 15:12
user3539626user3539626
1714
asked Jan 20 at 15:12
user3539626user3539626
1714
asked Jan 20 at 15:12
user3539626user3539626
1714
asked Jan 20 at 15:12
user3539626user3539626
1714
1714
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The key advantage of the standard query parser is that it supports a
robust and fairly intuitive syntax allowing you to create a variety of
structured queries. The largest disadvantage is that it’s very
intolerant of syntax errors, as compared with something like the
DisMax query parser which is designed to throw as few errors as
possible.
Standard Query parses is also known as Lucene query parser, so it's expect queries to be following correct syntax.
The DisMax query parser is designed to process simple phrases (without
complex syntax) entered by users and to search for individual terms
across several fields using different weighting (boosts) based on the
significance of each field. Additional options enable users to
influence the score based on rules specific to each use case
(independent of user input).
In general, the DisMax query parser’s interface is more like that of
Google than the interface of the 'lucene' (aka Standard) Solr query
parser. This similarity makes DisMax the appropriate query parser for
many consumer applications. It accepts a simple syntax, and it rarely
produces error messages.
The DisMax query parser supports an extremely simplified subset of the
Lucene QueryParser syntax. As in Lucene, quotes can be used to group
phrases, and +/- can be used to denote mandatory and optional clauses.
All other Lucene query parser special characters (except AND and OR)
are escaped to simplify the user experience. The DisMax query parser
takes responsibility for building a good query from the user’s input
using Boolean clauses containing DisMax queries across fields and
boosts specified by the user. It also lets the Solr administrator
provide additional boosting queries, boosting functions, and filtering
queries to artificially affect the outcome of all searches.
For more information on Standard Query Parser - https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_6/the-standard-query-parser.html , on DisMax - https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_6/the-dismax-query-parser.html
answered Jan 20 at 16:35
MysterionMysterion
6,73821942
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54277830%2fquery-parser-solr-difference-between-standard-query-parser-and-dismax-query-pa%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The key advantage of the standard query parser is that it supports a
robust and fairly intuitive syntax allowing you to create a variety of
structured queries. The largest disadvantage is that it’s very
intolerant of syntax errors, as compared with something like the
DisMax query parser which is designed to throw as few errors as
possible.
Standard Query parses is also known as Lucene query parser, so it's expect queries to be following correct syntax.
The DisMax query parser is designed to process simple phrases (without
complex syntax) entered by users and to search for individual terms
across several fields using different weighting (boosts) based on the
significance of each field. Additional options enable users to
influence the score based on rules specific to each use case
(independent of user input).
In general, the DisMax query parser’s interface is more like that of
Google than the interface of the 'lucene' (aka Standard) Solr query
parser. This similarity makes DisMax the appropriate query parser for
many consumer applications. It accepts a simple syntax, and it rarely
produces error messages.
The DisMax query parser supports an extremely simplified subset of the
Lucene QueryParser syntax. As in Lucene, quotes can be used to group
phrases, and +/- can be used to denote mandatory and optional clauses.
All other Lucene query parser special characters (except AND and OR)
are escaped to simplify the user experience. The DisMax query parser
takes responsibility for building a good query from the user’s input
using Boolean clauses containing DisMax queries across fields and
boosts specified by the user. It also lets the Solr administrator
provide additional boosting queries, boosting functions, and filtering
queries to artificially affect the outcome of all searches.
For more information on Standard Query Parser - https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_6/the-standard-query-parser.html , on DisMax - https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_6/the-dismax-query-parser.html
answered Jan 20 at 16:35
MysterionMysterion
6,73821942
add a comment |
The key advantage of the standard query parser is that it supports a
robust and fairly intuitive syntax allowing you to create a variety of
structured queries. The largest disadvantage is that it’s very
intolerant of syntax errors, as compared with something like the
DisMax query parser which is designed to throw as few errors as
possible.
Standard Query parses is also known as Lucene query parser, so it's expect queries to be following correct syntax.
The DisMax query parser is designed to process simple phrases (without
complex syntax) entered by users and to search for individual terms
across several fields using different weighting (boosts) based on the
significance of each field. Additional options enable users to
influence the score based on rules specific to each use case
(independent of user input).
In general, the DisMax query parser’s interface is more like that of
Google than the interface of the 'lucene' (aka Standard) Solr query
parser. This similarity makes DisMax the appropriate query parser for
many consumer applications. It accepts a simple syntax, and it rarely
produces error messages.
The DisMax query parser supports an extremely simplified subset of the
Lucene QueryParser syntax. As in Lucene, quotes can be used to group
phrases, and +/- can be used to denote mandatory and optional clauses.
All other Lucene query parser special characters (except AND and OR)
are escaped to simplify the user experience. The DisMax query parser
takes responsibility for building a good query from the user’s input
using Boolean clauses containing DisMax queries across fields and
boosts specified by the user. It also lets the Solr administrator
provide additional boosting queries, boosting functions, and filtering
queries to artificially affect the outcome of all searches.
For more information on Standard Query Parser - https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_6/the-standard-query-parser.html , on DisMax - https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_6/the-dismax-query-parser.html
answered Jan 20 at 16:35
MysterionMysterion
6,73821942
add a comment |
The key advantage of the standard query parser is that it supports a
robust and fairly intuitive syntax allowing you to create a variety of
structured queries. The largest disadvantage is that it’s very
intolerant of syntax errors, as compared with something like the
DisMax query parser which is designed to throw as few errors as
possible.
Standard Query parses is also known as Lucene query parser, so it's expect queries to be following correct syntax.
The DisMax query parser is designed to process simple phrases (without
complex syntax) entered by users and to search for individual terms
across several fields using different weighting (boosts) based on the
significance of each field. Additional options enable users to
influence the score based on rules specific to each use case
(independent of user input).
In general, the DisMax query parser’s interface is more like that of
Google than the interface of the 'lucene' (aka Standard) Solr query
parser. This similarity makes DisMax the appropriate query parser for
many consumer applications. It accepts a simple syntax, and it rarely
produces error messages.
The DisMax query parser supports an extremely simplified subset of the
Lucene QueryParser syntax. As in Lucene, quotes can be used to group
phrases, and +/- can be used to denote mandatory and optional clauses.
All other Lucene query parser special characters (except AND and OR)
are escaped to simplify the user experience. The DisMax query parser
takes responsibility for building a good query from the user’s input
using Boolean clauses containing DisMax queries across fields and
boosts specified by the user. It also lets the Solr administrator
provide additional boosting queries, boosting functions, and filtering
queries to artificially affect the outcome of all searches.
For more information on Standard Query Parser - https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_6/the-standard-query-parser.html , on DisMax - https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_6/the-dismax-query-parser.html
answered Jan 20 at 16:35
MysterionMysterion
6,73821942
The key advantage of the standard query parser is that it supports a
robust and fairly intuitive syntax allowing you to create a variety of
structured queries. The largest disadvantage is that it’s very
intolerant of syntax errors, as compared with something like the
DisMax query parser which is designed to throw as few errors as
possible.
Standard Query parses is also known as Lucene query parser, so it's expect queries to be following correct syntax.
The DisMax query parser is designed to process simple phrases (without
complex syntax) entered by users and to search for individual terms
across several fields using different weighting (boosts) based on the
significance of each field. Additional options enable users to
influence the score based on rules specific to each use case
(independent of user input).
In general, the DisMax query parser’s interface is more like that of
Google than the interface of the 'lucene' (aka Standard) Solr query
parser. This similarity makes DisMax the appropriate query parser for
many consumer applications. It accepts a simple syntax, and it rarely
produces error messages.
The DisMax query parser supports an extremely simplified subset of the
Lucene QueryParser syntax. As in Lucene, quotes can be used to group
phrases, and +/- can be used to denote mandatory and optional clauses.
All other Lucene query parser special characters (except AND and OR)
are escaped to simplify the user experience. The DisMax query parser
takes responsibility for building a good query from the user’s input
using Boolean clauses containing DisMax queries across fields and
boosts specified by the user. It also lets the Solr administrator
provide additional boosting queries, boosting functions, and filtering
queries to artificially affect the outcome of all searches.
For more information on Standard Query Parser - https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_6/the-standard-query-parser.html , on DisMax - https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_6/the-dismax-query-parser.html
answered Jan 20 at 16:35
MysterionMysterion
6,73821942
answered Jan 20 at 16:35
MysterionMysterion
6,73821942
answered Jan 20 at 16:35
MysterionMysterion
6,73821942
answered Jan 20 at 16:35
MysterionMysterion
6,73821942
6,73821942
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54277830%2fquery-parser-solr-difference-between-standard-query-parser-and-dismax-query-pa%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
