Why does the parent process explicitly recycle the resource of child process by using waitpid?












0















Why does the parent process have to explicitly recycle the resource of child process by using waitpid?
I can not understand why linux designs in this way.
I think it will be much simpler if the resource is recycled by kernel when the child process exit.










share|improve this question























  • "I think it will be much simpler if the resource is recycled by kernel when the child process exit." - At some point, the parent process would want to know about the child state. What should the parent do, if the child is completely destroyed?

    – Tsyvarev
    Jan 19 at 14:34











  • I don't think parent process should have to explicitly recycle the resource of child process. waitpid just a kind of synchronization or communication between parent and child.

    – Chris Tsui
    Jan 20 at 11:02
















0















Why does the parent process have to explicitly recycle the resource of child process by using waitpid?
I can not understand why linux designs in this way.
I think it will be much simpler if the resource is recycled by kernel when the child process exit.










share|improve this question























  • "I think it will be much simpler if the resource is recycled by kernel when the child process exit." - At some point, the parent process would want to know about the child state. What should the parent do, if the child is completely destroyed?

    – Tsyvarev
    Jan 19 at 14:34











  • I don't think parent process should have to explicitly recycle the resource of child process. waitpid just a kind of synchronization or communication between parent and child.

    – Chris Tsui
    Jan 20 at 11:02














0












0








0








Why does the parent process have to explicitly recycle the resource of child process by using waitpid?
I can not understand why linux designs in this way.
I think it will be much simpler if the resource is recycled by kernel when the child process exit.










share|improve this question














Why does the parent process have to explicitly recycle the resource of child process by using waitpid?
I can not understand why linux designs in this way.
I think it will be much simpler if the resource is recycled by kernel when the child process exit.







linux linux-kernel






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Jan 19 at 12:00









max maxmax max

1




1













  • "I think it will be much simpler if the resource is recycled by kernel when the child process exit." - At some point, the parent process would want to know about the child state. What should the parent do, if the child is completely destroyed?

    – Tsyvarev
    Jan 19 at 14:34











  • I don't think parent process should have to explicitly recycle the resource of child process. waitpid just a kind of synchronization or communication between parent and child.

    – Chris Tsui
    Jan 20 at 11:02



















  • "I think it will be much simpler if the resource is recycled by kernel when the child process exit." - At some point, the parent process would want to know about the child state. What should the parent do, if the child is completely destroyed?

    – Tsyvarev
    Jan 19 at 14:34











  • I don't think parent process should have to explicitly recycle the resource of child process. waitpid just a kind of synchronization or communication between parent and child.

    – Chris Tsui
    Jan 20 at 11:02

















"I think it will be much simpler if the resource is recycled by kernel when the child process exit." - At some point, the parent process would want to know about the child state. What should the parent do, if the child is completely destroyed?

– Tsyvarev
Jan 19 at 14:34





"I think it will be much simpler if the resource is recycled by kernel when the child process exit." - At some point, the parent process would want to know about the child state. What should the parent do, if the child is completely destroyed?

– Tsyvarev
Jan 19 at 14:34













I don't think parent process should have to explicitly recycle the resource of child process. waitpid just a kind of synchronization or communication between parent and child.

– Chris Tsui
Jan 20 at 11:02





I don't think parent process should have to explicitly recycle the resource of child process. waitpid just a kind of synchronization or communication between parent and child.

– Chris Tsui
Jan 20 at 11:02












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54266856%2fwhy-does-the-parent-process-explicitly-recycle-the-resource-of-child-process-by%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54266856%2fwhy-does-the-parent-process-explicitly-recycle-the-resource-of-child-process-by%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Liquibase includeAll doesn't find base path

How to use setInterval in EJS file?

Petrus Granier-Deferre