Query to retrieve x number of rows based on quantity from another table












0















Edit: I'm using SQL Server 2014



I need to write a query to return only the number of rows where the sum of the quantity covers a quantity from a different table.



I'm working with two tables. An inventory table and a purchase history table. I want to return the rows from the purchase history table for a specific inventory item where the sum of the quantities in said rows covers the quantity on hand from the inventory table, ordered by newest purchase date to oldest.



Example:

Inventory table



-------------------
| SKU | Quantity |
-------------------
| 1234 | 10 |
-------------------


Purchase history table



--------------------------------
| SKU | Quantity | Date |
--------------------------------
| 1234 | 5 | 2019-01-01 |
| 1234 | 3 | 2018-12-01 |
| 1234 | 9 | 2018-11-01 |
| 1234 | 4 | 2018-10-01 |
| 1234 | 12 | 2018-09-01 |
--------------------------------


This is the result I'm expecting



--------------------------------
| SKU | Quantity | Date |
--------------------------------
| 1234 | 5 | 2019-01-01 |
| 1234 | 3 | 2018-12-01 |
| 1234 | 9 | 2018-11-01 |
--------------------------------


Because 5 + 3 + 9 covers the 10 we have in stock.



Maybe I'm missing something simple, but I just can't think of how to get the results to stop at, in this specific case, the third record.



Also, I would really prefer to avoid using loops, if possible.



Any help would be greatly appreciated, because I just can't wrap my head around this one.










share|improve this question









New contributor




BrownJenkin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1





    Hi and welcome to SO. You will need a running total to solve. The solution to this varies greatly on the version of sql server you are using. Which version are you using?

    – Sean Lange
    Jan 18 at 16:26











  • I updated my question to say which version I'm using. Thanks for pointing that out!

    – BrownJenkin
    Jan 18 at 16:32
















0















Edit: I'm using SQL Server 2014



I need to write a query to return only the number of rows where the sum of the quantity covers a quantity from a different table.



I'm working with two tables. An inventory table and a purchase history table. I want to return the rows from the purchase history table for a specific inventory item where the sum of the quantities in said rows covers the quantity on hand from the inventory table, ordered by newest purchase date to oldest.



Example:

Inventory table



-------------------
| SKU | Quantity |
-------------------
| 1234 | 10 |
-------------------


Purchase history table



--------------------------------
| SKU | Quantity | Date |
--------------------------------
| 1234 | 5 | 2019-01-01 |
| 1234 | 3 | 2018-12-01 |
| 1234 | 9 | 2018-11-01 |
| 1234 | 4 | 2018-10-01 |
| 1234 | 12 | 2018-09-01 |
--------------------------------


This is the result I'm expecting



--------------------------------
| SKU | Quantity | Date |
--------------------------------
| 1234 | 5 | 2019-01-01 |
| 1234 | 3 | 2018-12-01 |
| 1234 | 9 | 2018-11-01 |
--------------------------------


Because 5 + 3 + 9 covers the 10 we have in stock.



Maybe I'm missing something simple, but I just can't think of how to get the results to stop at, in this specific case, the third record.



Also, I would really prefer to avoid using loops, if possible.



Any help would be greatly appreciated, because I just can't wrap my head around this one.










share|improve this question









New contributor




BrownJenkin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1





    Hi and welcome to SO. You will need a running total to solve. The solution to this varies greatly on the version of sql server you are using. Which version are you using?

    – Sean Lange
    Jan 18 at 16:26











  • I updated my question to say which version I'm using. Thanks for pointing that out!

    – BrownJenkin
    Jan 18 at 16:32














0












0








0








Edit: I'm using SQL Server 2014



I need to write a query to return only the number of rows where the sum of the quantity covers a quantity from a different table.



I'm working with two tables. An inventory table and a purchase history table. I want to return the rows from the purchase history table for a specific inventory item where the sum of the quantities in said rows covers the quantity on hand from the inventory table, ordered by newest purchase date to oldest.



Example:

Inventory table



-------------------
| SKU | Quantity |
-------------------
| 1234 | 10 |
-------------------


Purchase history table



--------------------------------
| SKU | Quantity | Date |
--------------------------------
| 1234 | 5 | 2019-01-01 |
| 1234 | 3 | 2018-12-01 |
| 1234 | 9 | 2018-11-01 |
| 1234 | 4 | 2018-10-01 |
| 1234 | 12 | 2018-09-01 |
--------------------------------


This is the result I'm expecting



--------------------------------
| SKU | Quantity | Date |
--------------------------------
| 1234 | 5 | 2019-01-01 |
| 1234 | 3 | 2018-12-01 |
| 1234 | 9 | 2018-11-01 |
--------------------------------


Because 5 + 3 + 9 covers the 10 we have in stock.



Maybe I'm missing something simple, but I just can't think of how to get the results to stop at, in this specific case, the third record.



Also, I would really prefer to avoid using loops, if possible.



Any help would be greatly appreciated, because I just can't wrap my head around this one.










share|improve this question









New contributor




BrownJenkin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












Edit: I'm using SQL Server 2014



I need to write a query to return only the number of rows where the sum of the quantity covers a quantity from a different table.



I'm working with two tables. An inventory table and a purchase history table. I want to return the rows from the purchase history table for a specific inventory item where the sum of the quantities in said rows covers the quantity on hand from the inventory table, ordered by newest purchase date to oldest.



Example:

Inventory table



-------------------
| SKU | Quantity |
-------------------
| 1234 | 10 |
-------------------


Purchase history table



--------------------------------
| SKU | Quantity | Date |
--------------------------------
| 1234 | 5 | 2019-01-01 |
| 1234 | 3 | 2018-12-01 |
| 1234 | 9 | 2018-11-01 |
| 1234 | 4 | 2018-10-01 |
| 1234 | 12 | 2018-09-01 |
--------------------------------


This is the result I'm expecting



--------------------------------
| SKU | Quantity | Date |
--------------------------------
| 1234 | 5 | 2019-01-01 |
| 1234 | 3 | 2018-12-01 |
| 1234 | 9 | 2018-11-01 |
--------------------------------


Because 5 + 3 + 9 covers the 10 we have in stock.



Maybe I'm missing something simple, but I just can't think of how to get the results to stop at, in this specific case, the third record.



Also, I would really prefer to avoid using loops, if possible.



Any help would be greatly appreciated, because I just can't wrap my head around this one.







sql-server sql-server-2014






share|improve this question









New contributor




BrownJenkin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




BrownJenkin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 18 at 16:34









Sean Lange

24.7k21835




24.7k21835






New contributor




BrownJenkin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Jan 18 at 16:23









BrownJenkinBrownJenkin

11




11




New contributor




BrownJenkin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





BrownJenkin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






BrownJenkin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1





    Hi and welcome to SO. You will need a running total to solve. The solution to this varies greatly on the version of sql server you are using. Which version are you using?

    – Sean Lange
    Jan 18 at 16:26











  • I updated my question to say which version I'm using. Thanks for pointing that out!

    – BrownJenkin
    Jan 18 at 16:32














  • 1





    Hi and welcome to SO. You will need a running total to solve. The solution to this varies greatly on the version of sql server you are using. Which version are you using?

    – Sean Lange
    Jan 18 at 16:26











  • I updated my question to say which version I'm using. Thanks for pointing that out!

    – BrownJenkin
    Jan 18 at 16:32








1




1





Hi and welcome to SO. You will need a running total to solve. The solution to this varies greatly on the version of sql server you are using. Which version are you using?

– Sean Lange
Jan 18 at 16:26





Hi and welcome to SO. You will need a running total to solve. The solution to this varies greatly on the version of sql server you are using. Which version are you using?

– Sean Lange
Jan 18 at 16:26













I updated my question to say which version I'm using. Thanks for pointing that out!

– BrownJenkin
Jan 18 at 16:32





I updated my question to say which version I'm using. Thanks for pointing that out!

– BrownJenkin
Jan 18 at 16:32












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















1














Another option is a CROSS APPLY



Example



Select B.* 
From Inventory A
Cross Apply (
Select *
From (
Select *,RB = sum([Quantity]) over (Partition By SKU Order by Date Desc) - Quantity
From Purchase
Where SKU=A.SKU
) B1
Where RB<=A.Quantity
) B





share|improve this answer































    0














    you can do it with an INNER JOIN



    when summing the rows, I use IIF to set the current row to zero in the sum, because I don't want to include that in the check



    begin try drop table #Phistory end try begin catch end catch;
    begin try drop table #inventory end try begin catch end catch;
    SELECT 1234 SKU,5 Quantity, cast('20190101' as date) [date] into #Phistory;
    INSERT #Phistory (SKU, Quantity,[date]) VALUES (1234,3,'20181201'), (1234,9,'20181101'),(1234,4,'20181001'),(1234,12,'20180901'),(1235,3,'20181201'), (1235,9,'20181101'),(1235,4,'20181001'),(1235,12,'20180901'),(1235,500,'20180801'),(1235,50,'20180601');
    select 1234 SKU, 10 quantity into #inventory;
    insert #inventory values(1235,99);

    SELECT p1.SKU,
    p1.Quantity,
    p1.[Date],
    SUM(p2.quantity) RunningTotal
    FROM #Phistory p1
    JOIN #PHistory p2
    ON p1.SKU = p2.sku and p2.date >= p1.date
    GROUP BY p1.SKU,
    p1.Quantity,
    p1.[Date]
    HAVING SUM(IIF(p1.date = p2.date , 0 , p2.quantity))
    <= (SELECT inv.quantity from #inventory inv where inv.sku = p1.sku)
    order by p1.sku,p1.date DESC;





    share|improve this answer































      0














      I think you could probably do something like the following (untested):



      SELECT ph.sku, ph.quantity, ph.date
      FROM
      (SELECT
      purchasehistory.*,
      SUM(quantity) OVER (PARTITION BY sku ORDER BY date ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW) as tquantity
      FROM purchasehistory) ph inner join inventory i
      on ph.sku = i.sku
      WHERE
      ph.tquantity <= i.quantity


      The idea here is to calculate the running sum in the inner query, then join with your inventory table. I've made an assumption with the ORDER BY date, but you could adjust that.



      Edit: So based on the comment that you want the first N rows that use all your inventory (as opposed to the first N rows that don't exceed your inventory) I think you could do something like:



      SELECT ph.sku, ph.quantity, ph.date
      FROM
      (SELECT
      purchasehistory.*,
      SUM(quantity) OVER (PARTITION BY sku ORDER BY date ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND 1 PRECEDING) as tquantity
      FROM purchasehistory) ph inner join inventory i
      on ph.sku = i.sku
      WHERE
      ph.tquantity < i.quantity


      This is the same basic idea but the running sum is switched to only count previous rows (not include the current row) and the join uses < rather than <=. That way if the previous rows quantity didn't total to inventory yet, you will include the next row (even if that total now exceeds inventory).






      share|improve this answer


























      • This got me very, very close. The SKU I'm looking at has 10 in inventory and the purchase history record I'm expecting has 12. That 12 would cover the 10 just fine. But ph.tquantity <= i.quantity is filtering it out. I'm not sure what other conditional would work there.

        – BrownJenkin
        Jan 18 at 18:46











      • I've added another version to the answer now that I think I understand the question better.

        – EdmCoff
        Jan 18 at 19:25











      Your Answer






      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
      StackExchange.snippets.init();
      });
      });
      }, "code-snippets");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "1"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });






      BrownJenkin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54257848%2fquery-to-retrieve-x-number-of-rows-based-on-quantity-from-another-table%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1














      Another option is a CROSS APPLY



      Example



      Select B.* 
      From Inventory A
      Cross Apply (
      Select *
      From (
      Select *,RB = sum([Quantity]) over (Partition By SKU Order by Date Desc) - Quantity
      From Purchase
      Where SKU=A.SKU
      ) B1
      Where RB<=A.Quantity
      ) B





      share|improve this answer




























        1














        Another option is a CROSS APPLY



        Example



        Select B.* 
        From Inventory A
        Cross Apply (
        Select *
        From (
        Select *,RB = sum([Quantity]) over (Partition By SKU Order by Date Desc) - Quantity
        From Purchase
        Where SKU=A.SKU
        ) B1
        Where RB<=A.Quantity
        ) B





        share|improve this answer


























          1












          1








          1







          Another option is a CROSS APPLY



          Example



          Select B.* 
          From Inventory A
          Cross Apply (
          Select *
          From (
          Select *,RB = sum([Quantity]) over (Partition By SKU Order by Date Desc) - Quantity
          From Purchase
          Where SKU=A.SKU
          ) B1
          Where RB<=A.Quantity
          ) B





          share|improve this answer













          Another option is a CROSS APPLY



          Example



          Select B.* 
          From Inventory A
          Cross Apply (
          Select *
          From (
          Select *,RB = sum([Quantity]) over (Partition By SKU Order by Date Desc) - Quantity
          From Purchase
          Where SKU=A.SKU
          ) B1
          Where RB<=A.Quantity
          ) B






          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Jan 18 at 16:50









          John CappellettiJohn Cappelletti

          45.5k62546




          45.5k62546

























              0














              you can do it with an INNER JOIN



              when summing the rows, I use IIF to set the current row to zero in the sum, because I don't want to include that in the check



              begin try drop table #Phistory end try begin catch end catch;
              begin try drop table #inventory end try begin catch end catch;
              SELECT 1234 SKU,5 Quantity, cast('20190101' as date) [date] into #Phistory;
              INSERT #Phistory (SKU, Quantity,[date]) VALUES (1234,3,'20181201'), (1234,9,'20181101'),(1234,4,'20181001'),(1234,12,'20180901'),(1235,3,'20181201'), (1235,9,'20181101'),(1235,4,'20181001'),(1235,12,'20180901'),(1235,500,'20180801'),(1235,50,'20180601');
              select 1234 SKU, 10 quantity into #inventory;
              insert #inventory values(1235,99);

              SELECT p1.SKU,
              p1.Quantity,
              p1.[Date],
              SUM(p2.quantity) RunningTotal
              FROM #Phistory p1
              JOIN #PHistory p2
              ON p1.SKU = p2.sku and p2.date >= p1.date
              GROUP BY p1.SKU,
              p1.Quantity,
              p1.[Date]
              HAVING SUM(IIF(p1.date = p2.date , 0 , p2.quantity))
              <= (SELECT inv.quantity from #inventory inv where inv.sku = p1.sku)
              order by p1.sku,p1.date DESC;





              share|improve this answer




























                0














                you can do it with an INNER JOIN



                when summing the rows, I use IIF to set the current row to zero in the sum, because I don't want to include that in the check



                begin try drop table #Phistory end try begin catch end catch;
                begin try drop table #inventory end try begin catch end catch;
                SELECT 1234 SKU,5 Quantity, cast('20190101' as date) [date] into #Phistory;
                INSERT #Phistory (SKU, Quantity,[date]) VALUES (1234,3,'20181201'), (1234,9,'20181101'),(1234,4,'20181001'),(1234,12,'20180901'),(1235,3,'20181201'), (1235,9,'20181101'),(1235,4,'20181001'),(1235,12,'20180901'),(1235,500,'20180801'),(1235,50,'20180601');
                select 1234 SKU, 10 quantity into #inventory;
                insert #inventory values(1235,99);

                SELECT p1.SKU,
                p1.Quantity,
                p1.[Date],
                SUM(p2.quantity) RunningTotal
                FROM #Phistory p1
                JOIN #PHistory p2
                ON p1.SKU = p2.sku and p2.date >= p1.date
                GROUP BY p1.SKU,
                p1.Quantity,
                p1.[Date]
                HAVING SUM(IIF(p1.date = p2.date , 0 , p2.quantity))
                <= (SELECT inv.quantity from #inventory inv where inv.sku = p1.sku)
                order by p1.sku,p1.date DESC;





                share|improve this answer


























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  you can do it with an INNER JOIN



                  when summing the rows, I use IIF to set the current row to zero in the sum, because I don't want to include that in the check



                  begin try drop table #Phistory end try begin catch end catch;
                  begin try drop table #inventory end try begin catch end catch;
                  SELECT 1234 SKU,5 Quantity, cast('20190101' as date) [date] into #Phistory;
                  INSERT #Phistory (SKU, Quantity,[date]) VALUES (1234,3,'20181201'), (1234,9,'20181101'),(1234,4,'20181001'),(1234,12,'20180901'),(1235,3,'20181201'), (1235,9,'20181101'),(1235,4,'20181001'),(1235,12,'20180901'),(1235,500,'20180801'),(1235,50,'20180601');
                  select 1234 SKU, 10 quantity into #inventory;
                  insert #inventory values(1235,99);

                  SELECT p1.SKU,
                  p1.Quantity,
                  p1.[Date],
                  SUM(p2.quantity) RunningTotal
                  FROM #Phistory p1
                  JOIN #PHistory p2
                  ON p1.SKU = p2.sku and p2.date >= p1.date
                  GROUP BY p1.SKU,
                  p1.Quantity,
                  p1.[Date]
                  HAVING SUM(IIF(p1.date = p2.date , 0 , p2.quantity))
                  <= (SELECT inv.quantity from #inventory inv where inv.sku = p1.sku)
                  order by p1.sku,p1.date DESC;





                  share|improve this answer













                  you can do it with an INNER JOIN



                  when summing the rows, I use IIF to set the current row to zero in the sum, because I don't want to include that in the check



                  begin try drop table #Phistory end try begin catch end catch;
                  begin try drop table #inventory end try begin catch end catch;
                  SELECT 1234 SKU,5 Quantity, cast('20190101' as date) [date] into #Phistory;
                  INSERT #Phistory (SKU, Quantity,[date]) VALUES (1234,3,'20181201'), (1234,9,'20181101'),(1234,4,'20181001'),(1234,12,'20180901'),(1235,3,'20181201'), (1235,9,'20181101'),(1235,4,'20181001'),(1235,12,'20180901'),(1235,500,'20180801'),(1235,50,'20180601');
                  select 1234 SKU, 10 quantity into #inventory;
                  insert #inventory values(1235,99);

                  SELECT p1.SKU,
                  p1.Quantity,
                  p1.[Date],
                  SUM(p2.quantity) RunningTotal
                  FROM #Phistory p1
                  JOIN #PHistory p2
                  ON p1.SKU = p2.sku and p2.date >= p1.date
                  GROUP BY p1.SKU,
                  p1.Quantity,
                  p1.[Date]
                  HAVING SUM(IIF(p1.date = p2.date , 0 , p2.quantity))
                  <= (SELECT inv.quantity from #inventory inv where inv.sku = p1.sku)
                  order by p1.sku,p1.date DESC;






                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Jan 18 at 17:19









                  CatoCato

                  2,807210




                  2,807210























                      0














                      I think you could probably do something like the following (untested):



                      SELECT ph.sku, ph.quantity, ph.date
                      FROM
                      (SELECT
                      purchasehistory.*,
                      SUM(quantity) OVER (PARTITION BY sku ORDER BY date ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW) as tquantity
                      FROM purchasehistory) ph inner join inventory i
                      on ph.sku = i.sku
                      WHERE
                      ph.tquantity <= i.quantity


                      The idea here is to calculate the running sum in the inner query, then join with your inventory table. I've made an assumption with the ORDER BY date, but you could adjust that.



                      Edit: So based on the comment that you want the first N rows that use all your inventory (as opposed to the first N rows that don't exceed your inventory) I think you could do something like:



                      SELECT ph.sku, ph.quantity, ph.date
                      FROM
                      (SELECT
                      purchasehistory.*,
                      SUM(quantity) OVER (PARTITION BY sku ORDER BY date ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND 1 PRECEDING) as tquantity
                      FROM purchasehistory) ph inner join inventory i
                      on ph.sku = i.sku
                      WHERE
                      ph.tquantity < i.quantity


                      This is the same basic idea but the running sum is switched to only count previous rows (not include the current row) and the join uses < rather than <=. That way if the previous rows quantity didn't total to inventory yet, you will include the next row (even if that total now exceeds inventory).






                      share|improve this answer


























                      • This got me very, very close. The SKU I'm looking at has 10 in inventory and the purchase history record I'm expecting has 12. That 12 would cover the 10 just fine. But ph.tquantity <= i.quantity is filtering it out. I'm not sure what other conditional would work there.

                        – BrownJenkin
                        Jan 18 at 18:46











                      • I've added another version to the answer now that I think I understand the question better.

                        – EdmCoff
                        Jan 18 at 19:25
















                      0














                      I think you could probably do something like the following (untested):



                      SELECT ph.sku, ph.quantity, ph.date
                      FROM
                      (SELECT
                      purchasehistory.*,
                      SUM(quantity) OVER (PARTITION BY sku ORDER BY date ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW) as tquantity
                      FROM purchasehistory) ph inner join inventory i
                      on ph.sku = i.sku
                      WHERE
                      ph.tquantity <= i.quantity


                      The idea here is to calculate the running sum in the inner query, then join with your inventory table. I've made an assumption with the ORDER BY date, but you could adjust that.



                      Edit: So based on the comment that you want the first N rows that use all your inventory (as opposed to the first N rows that don't exceed your inventory) I think you could do something like:



                      SELECT ph.sku, ph.quantity, ph.date
                      FROM
                      (SELECT
                      purchasehistory.*,
                      SUM(quantity) OVER (PARTITION BY sku ORDER BY date ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND 1 PRECEDING) as tquantity
                      FROM purchasehistory) ph inner join inventory i
                      on ph.sku = i.sku
                      WHERE
                      ph.tquantity < i.quantity


                      This is the same basic idea but the running sum is switched to only count previous rows (not include the current row) and the join uses < rather than <=. That way if the previous rows quantity didn't total to inventory yet, you will include the next row (even if that total now exceeds inventory).






                      share|improve this answer


























                      • This got me very, very close. The SKU I'm looking at has 10 in inventory and the purchase history record I'm expecting has 12. That 12 would cover the 10 just fine. But ph.tquantity <= i.quantity is filtering it out. I'm not sure what other conditional would work there.

                        – BrownJenkin
                        Jan 18 at 18:46











                      • I've added another version to the answer now that I think I understand the question better.

                        – EdmCoff
                        Jan 18 at 19:25














                      0












                      0








                      0







                      I think you could probably do something like the following (untested):



                      SELECT ph.sku, ph.quantity, ph.date
                      FROM
                      (SELECT
                      purchasehistory.*,
                      SUM(quantity) OVER (PARTITION BY sku ORDER BY date ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW) as tquantity
                      FROM purchasehistory) ph inner join inventory i
                      on ph.sku = i.sku
                      WHERE
                      ph.tquantity <= i.quantity


                      The idea here is to calculate the running sum in the inner query, then join with your inventory table. I've made an assumption with the ORDER BY date, but you could adjust that.



                      Edit: So based on the comment that you want the first N rows that use all your inventory (as opposed to the first N rows that don't exceed your inventory) I think you could do something like:



                      SELECT ph.sku, ph.quantity, ph.date
                      FROM
                      (SELECT
                      purchasehistory.*,
                      SUM(quantity) OVER (PARTITION BY sku ORDER BY date ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND 1 PRECEDING) as tquantity
                      FROM purchasehistory) ph inner join inventory i
                      on ph.sku = i.sku
                      WHERE
                      ph.tquantity < i.quantity


                      This is the same basic idea but the running sum is switched to only count previous rows (not include the current row) and the join uses < rather than <=. That way if the previous rows quantity didn't total to inventory yet, you will include the next row (even if that total now exceeds inventory).






                      share|improve this answer















                      I think you could probably do something like the following (untested):



                      SELECT ph.sku, ph.quantity, ph.date
                      FROM
                      (SELECT
                      purchasehistory.*,
                      SUM(quantity) OVER (PARTITION BY sku ORDER BY date ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW) as tquantity
                      FROM purchasehistory) ph inner join inventory i
                      on ph.sku = i.sku
                      WHERE
                      ph.tquantity <= i.quantity


                      The idea here is to calculate the running sum in the inner query, then join with your inventory table. I've made an assumption with the ORDER BY date, but you could adjust that.



                      Edit: So based on the comment that you want the first N rows that use all your inventory (as opposed to the first N rows that don't exceed your inventory) I think you could do something like:



                      SELECT ph.sku, ph.quantity, ph.date
                      FROM
                      (SELECT
                      purchasehistory.*,
                      SUM(quantity) OVER (PARTITION BY sku ORDER BY date ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND 1 PRECEDING) as tquantity
                      FROM purchasehistory) ph inner join inventory i
                      on ph.sku = i.sku
                      WHERE
                      ph.tquantity < i.quantity


                      This is the same basic idea but the running sum is switched to only count previous rows (not include the current row) and the join uses < rather than <=. That way if the previous rows quantity didn't total to inventory yet, you will include the next row (even if that total now exceeds inventory).







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited Jan 18 at 19:24

























                      answered Jan 18 at 16:43









                      EdmCoffEdmCoff

                      96936




                      96936













                      • This got me very, very close. The SKU I'm looking at has 10 in inventory and the purchase history record I'm expecting has 12. That 12 would cover the 10 just fine. But ph.tquantity <= i.quantity is filtering it out. I'm not sure what other conditional would work there.

                        – BrownJenkin
                        Jan 18 at 18:46











                      • I've added another version to the answer now that I think I understand the question better.

                        – EdmCoff
                        Jan 18 at 19:25



















                      • This got me very, very close. The SKU I'm looking at has 10 in inventory and the purchase history record I'm expecting has 12. That 12 would cover the 10 just fine. But ph.tquantity <= i.quantity is filtering it out. I'm not sure what other conditional would work there.

                        – BrownJenkin
                        Jan 18 at 18:46











                      • I've added another version to the answer now that I think I understand the question better.

                        – EdmCoff
                        Jan 18 at 19:25

















                      This got me very, very close. The SKU I'm looking at has 10 in inventory and the purchase history record I'm expecting has 12. That 12 would cover the 10 just fine. But ph.tquantity <= i.quantity is filtering it out. I'm not sure what other conditional would work there.

                      – BrownJenkin
                      Jan 18 at 18:46





                      This got me very, very close. The SKU I'm looking at has 10 in inventory and the purchase history record I'm expecting has 12. That 12 would cover the 10 just fine. But ph.tquantity <= i.quantity is filtering it out. I'm not sure what other conditional would work there.

                      – BrownJenkin
                      Jan 18 at 18:46













                      I've added another version to the answer now that I think I understand the question better.

                      – EdmCoff
                      Jan 18 at 19:25





                      I've added another version to the answer now that I think I understand the question better.

                      – EdmCoff
                      Jan 18 at 19:25










                      BrownJenkin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      BrownJenkin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                      BrownJenkin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      BrownJenkin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54257848%2fquery-to-retrieve-x-number-of-rows-based-on-quantity-from-another-table%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Homophylophilia

                      Updating UILabel text programmatically using a function

                      Cloud Functions - OpenCV Videocapture Read method fails for larger files from cloud storage