How to make predictions even with NAs using predict()?
I want to use predict()
with a polr()
model to predict variable z
, as per the following code. This first is the df
to train the model and the subsequent test
data.
df <- data.frame(x=c(1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 2),
y=c(32, 67, 12, 89, 45, 78, 43, 47, 14, 67, 16, 36, 25, 23, 56, 26, 35, 79, 13, 44),
z=as.factor(c(1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2)))
test <- data.frame(x=c(1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 2, 1, 1),
y=c(34, NA, 78, NA, 89, 17, 27, 83, 23, 48),
z=c(1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 1))
This is the polr()
model:
mod <- polr(z ~ x + y, data = df, Hess = TRUE)
And this is the predict()
function with its outcome:
predict(mod, newdata = test)
[1] 2 <NA> 2 <NA> 2 2 2 2 2 2
My problem is that I want the model to make predictions even when there are NAs
, as in the 2nd and 4th cases. I have tried the following, with the same result:
predict(mod, newdata = test, na.action = "na.exclude")
predict(mod, newdata = test, na.action = "na.pass")
predict(mod, newdata = test, na.action = "na.omit")
predict(mod, newdata = test, na.rm=T)
[1] 2 <NA> 2 <NA> 2 2 2 2 2 2
How can I get the model to make predictions even when there's some missing data?
linear-regression na predict
add a comment |
I want to use predict()
with a polr()
model to predict variable z
, as per the following code. This first is the df
to train the model and the subsequent test
data.
df <- data.frame(x=c(1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 2),
y=c(32, 67, 12, 89, 45, 78, 43, 47, 14, 67, 16, 36, 25, 23, 56, 26, 35, 79, 13, 44),
z=as.factor(c(1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2)))
test <- data.frame(x=c(1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 2, 1, 1),
y=c(34, NA, 78, NA, 89, 17, 27, 83, 23, 48),
z=c(1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 1))
This is the polr()
model:
mod <- polr(z ~ x + y, data = df, Hess = TRUE)
And this is the predict()
function with its outcome:
predict(mod, newdata = test)
[1] 2 <NA> 2 <NA> 2 2 2 2 2 2
My problem is that I want the model to make predictions even when there are NAs
, as in the 2nd and 4th cases. I have tried the following, with the same result:
predict(mod, newdata = test, na.action = "na.exclude")
predict(mod, newdata = test, na.action = "na.pass")
predict(mod, newdata = test, na.action = "na.omit")
predict(mod, newdata = test, na.rm=T)
[1] 2 <NA> 2 <NA> 2 2 2 2 2 2
How can I get the model to make predictions even when there's some missing data?
linear-regression na predict
When I viewed a 3D scatterplot of the data from various angles, the data does not appear to be on a smooth surface.
– James Phillips
Jan 18 at 21:10
@JamesPhillips I just created this data as an example. The underlying problem is that the model can’t make a prediction when there’s an NA.
– Marco Pastor Mayo
Jan 19 at 11:56
add a comment |
I want to use predict()
with a polr()
model to predict variable z
, as per the following code. This first is the df
to train the model and the subsequent test
data.
df <- data.frame(x=c(1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 2),
y=c(32, 67, 12, 89, 45, 78, 43, 47, 14, 67, 16, 36, 25, 23, 56, 26, 35, 79, 13, 44),
z=as.factor(c(1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2)))
test <- data.frame(x=c(1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 2, 1, 1),
y=c(34, NA, 78, NA, 89, 17, 27, 83, 23, 48),
z=c(1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 1))
This is the polr()
model:
mod <- polr(z ~ x + y, data = df, Hess = TRUE)
And this is the predict()
function with its outcome:
predict(mod, newdata = test)
[1] 2 <NA> 2 <NA> 2 2 2 2 2 2
My problem is that I want the model to make predictions even when there are NAs
, as in the 2nd and 4th cases. I have tried the following, with the same result:
predict(mod, newdata = test, na.action = "na.exclude")
predict(mod, newdata = test, na.action = "na.pass")
predict(mod, newdata = test, na.action = "na.omit")
predict(mod, newdata = test, na.rm=T)
[1] 2 <NA> 2 <NA> 2 2 2 2 2 2
How can I get the model to make predictions even when there's some missing data?
linear-regression na predict
I want to use predict()
with a polr()
model to predict variable z
, as per the following code. This first is the df
to train the model and the subsequent test
data.
df <- data.frame(x=c(1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 2),
y=c(32, 67, 12, 89, 45, 78, 43, 47, 14, 67, 16, 36, 25, 23, 56, 26, 35, 79, 13, 44),
z=as.factor(c(1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2)))
test <- data.frame(x=c(1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 2, 1, 1),
y=c(34, NA, 78, NA, 89, 17, 27, 83, 23, 48),
z=c(1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 1))
This is the polr()
model:
mod <- polr(z ~ x + y, data = df, Hess = TRUE)
And this is the predict()
function with its outcome:
predict(mod, newdata = test)
[1] 2 <NA> 2 <NA> 2 2 2 2 2 2
My problem is that I want the model to make predictions even when there are NAs
, as in the 2nd and 4th cases. I have tried the following, with the same result:
predict(mod, newdata = test, na.action = "na.exclude")
predict(mod, newdata = test, na.action = "na.pass")
predict(mod, newdata = test, na.action = "na.omit")
predict(mod, newdata = test, na.rm=T)
[1] 2 <NA> 2 <NA> 2 2 2 2 2 2
How can I get the model to make predictions even when there's some missing data?
linear-regression na predict
linear-regression na predict
asked Jan 18 at 17:38
Marco Pastor MayoMarco Pastor Mayo
766
766
When I viewed a 3D scatterplot of the data from various angles, the data does not appear to be on a smooth surface.
– James Phillips
Jan 18 at 21:10
@JamesPhillips I just created this data as an example. The underlying problem is that the model can’t make a prediction when there’s an NA.
– Marco Pastor Mayo
Jan 19 at 11:56
add a comment |
When I viewed a 3D scatterplot of the data from various angles, the data does not appear to be on a smooth surface.
– James Phillips
Jan 18 at 21:10
@JamesPhillips I just created this data as an example. The underlying problem is that the model can’t make a prediction when there’s an NA.
– Marco Pastor Mayo
Jan 19 at 11:56
When I viewed a 3D scatterplot of the data from various angles, the data does not appear to be on a smooth surface.
– James Phillips
Jan 18 at 21:10
When I viewed a 3D scatterplot of the data from various angles, the data does not appear to be on a smooth surface.
– James Phillips
Jan 18 at 21:10
@JamesPhillips I just created this data as an example. The underlying problem is that the model can’t make a prediction when there’s an NA.
– Marco Pastor Mayo
Jan 19 at 11:56
@JamesPhillips I just created this data as an example. The underlying problem is that the model can’t make a prediction when there’s an NA.
– Marco Pastor Mayo
Jan 19 at 11:56
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54258943%2fhow-to-make-predictions-even-with-nas-using-predict%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54258943%2fhow-to-make-predictions-even-with-nas-using-predict%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
When I viewed a 3D scatterplot of the data from various angles, the data does not appear to be on a smooth surface.
– James Phillips
Jan 18 at 21:10
@JamesPhillips I just created this data as an example. The underlying problem is that the model can’t make a prediction when there’s an NA.
– Marco Pastor Mayo
Jan 19 at 11:56