Updating md5 to sha512 authorizenet
I am updating the md5 to sha512 for DPM authorizenet-
Please help me out -
I am not getting it work.
see code change -
while generating fingerprint for x_hp_hash -
from md5 -
if (function_exists('hash_hmac')) {
return hash_hmac("md5", $api_login_id . "^" . $fp_sequence . "^" .
$fp_timestamp . "^" . $amount . "^", $transaction_key);
}
return bin2hex(mhash(MHASH_MD5, $api_login_id . "^" . $fp_sequence . "^" . $fp_timestamp . "^" . $amount . "^", $transaction_key));
to sha512 -
$signature_key = hex2bin($signature_key);
if (function_exists('hash_hmac')) {
return hash_hmac("sha512", $api_login_id . "^" . $fp_sequence . "^" .
$fp_timestamp . "^" . $amount . "^", $signature_key);
}
return bin2hex(mhash(MHASH_SHA512, $api_login_id . "^" . $fp_sequence . "^" . $fp_timestamp . "^" . $amount . "^", $signature_key));
While getting reponse and comparing the x_sha_hash value
from md5 -
if(strtoupper(md5($this->md5_setting . $this->api_login_id . $this
->transaction_id . $amount)) == $this->md5_hash){
//valid
} else{
//not valid
}
Changed to sha512 -
$this->signature_key = hex2bin($this->signature_key);
$string = '^'.$this->api_login_id.'^'.$this->transaction_id.'^'.$amount.'^';
if(strtoupper(HASH_HMAC('sha512', $string, $this->signature_key)) == $this->SHA2_Hash){
//valid
} else{
//not valid
}
What I am doing wrong?
When validating the transaction at my end it is saying please check your md5 setting. It validates on the basis of last code shown in the snippet.
my signature Key = E284BDC12A45A7F5B0933A352EB1C3F25E91A3B92360693D94E4366190EF12E78F6CFE8601751F719DA7A72ABBA117BF0161F8A1DD894DADE3C56A838D8355AD
x_hp_hash submitting using the second code snippet (i.e sha512 fingerprint)
x_hp_hash = b4c9e1878f88aa9c4f808761ed8ceee71ab117cc0f1297b2d850e28351f08fc52bd528a7538c832568c674a1d5095ead1a5383a626c9797587ab16bae76e45fb
after submitting getting in reponse -
X_SHA2_Hash - 19AB7947709CF6CB2B8415784EBD7669FCDE5D83B69EC8C716203806A3235308187668F5783F9CA0F1AE8A47808EDAB241025A8AF61A2FABC27FA6AAAEA8FFD8
generated hash code -
3E6427E67271B1F0732D3D95217D25EE4D7C4103C906A6CB70943498698157F48F7BECD5C7E5393CF2A489B464070A7778F15757385E8F29029CFC3F66256F05
using last snippet above.
so these are not equal so not a valid transaction.
php payment-gateway authorize.net
add a comment |
I am updating the md5 to sha512 for DPM authorizenet-
Please help me out -
I am not getting it work.
see code change -
while generating fingerprint for x_hp_hash -
from md5 -
if (function_exists('hash_hmac')) {
return hash_hmac("md5", $api_login_id . "^" . $fp_sequence . "^" .
$fp_timestamp . "^" . $amount . "^", $transaction_key);
}
return bin2hex(mhash(MHASH_MD5, $api_login_id . "^" . $fp_sequence . "^" . $fp_timestamp . "^" . $amount . "^", $transaction_key));
to sha512 -
$signature_key = hex2bin($signature_key);
if (function_exists('hash_hmac')) {
return hash_hmac("sha512", $api_login_id . "^" . $fp_sequence . "^" .
$fp_timestamp . "^" . $amount . "^", $signature_key);
}
return bin2hex(mhash(MHASH_SHA512, $api_login_id . "^" . $fp_sequence . "^" . $fp_timestamp . "^" . $amount . "^", $signature_key));
While getting reponse and comparing the x_sha_hash value
from md5 -
if(strtoupper(md5($this->md5_setting . $this->api_login_id . $this
->transaction_id . $amount)) == $this->md5_hash){
//valid
} else{
//not valid
}
Changed to sha512 -
$this->signature_key = hex2bin($this->signature_key);
$string = '^'.$this->api_login_id.'^'.$this->transaction_id.'^'.$amount.'^';
if(strtoupper(HASH_HMAC('sha512', $string, $this->signature_key)) == $this->SHA2_Hash){
//valid
} else{
//not valid
}
What I am doing wrong?
When validating the transaction at my end it is saying please check your md5 setting. It validates on the basis of last code shown in the snippet.
my signature Key = E284BDC12A45A7F5B0933A352EB1C3F25E91A3B92360693D94E4366190EF12E78F6CFE8601751F719DA7A72ABBA117BF0161F8A1DD894DADE3C56A838D8355AD
x_hp_hash submitting using the second code snippet (i.e sha512 fingerprint)
x_hp_hash = b4c9e1878f88aa9c4f808761ed8ceee71ab117cc0f1297b2d850e28351f08fc52bd528a7538c832568c674a1d5095ead1a5383a626c9797587ab16bae76e45fb
after submitting getting in reponse -
X_SHA2_Hash - 19AB7947709CF6CB2B8415784EBD7669FCDE5D83B69EC8C716203806A3235308187668F5783F9CA0F1AE8A47808EDAB241025A8AF61A2FABC27FA6AAAEA8FFD8
generated hash code -
3E6427E67271B1F0732D3D95217D25EE4D7C4103C906A6CB70943498698157F48F7BECD5C7E5393CF2A489B464070A7778F15757385E8F29029CFC3F66256F05
using last snippet above.
so these are not equal so not a valid transaction.
php payment-gateway authorize.net
2
What errors are you seeing? What is the question here? Edit the question and make sure it is clear what you are trying to do, and what results you get. Hint: if you make unit tests before your change you will have some baseline for the parts that break later.
– jdv
Jan 18 at 15:50
@jdv I have updated my question. Please have a look
– Vikas Chauhan
Jan 21 at 10:06
add a comment |
I am updating the md5 to sha512 for DPM authorizenet-
Please help me out -
I am not getting it work.
see code change -
while generating fingerprint for x_hp_hash -
from md5 -
if (function_exists('hash_hmac')) {
return hash_hmac("md5", $api_login_id . "^" . $fp_sequence . "^" .
$fp_timestamp . "^" . $amount . "^", $transaction_key);
}
return bin2hex(mhash(MHASH_MD5, $api_login_id . "^" . $fp_sequence . "^" . $fp_timestamp . "^" . $amount . "^", $transaction_key));
to sha512 -
$signature_key = hex2bin($signature_key);
if (function_exists('hash_hmac')) {
return hash_hmac("sha512", $api_login_id . "^" . $fp_sequence . "^" .
$fp_timestamp . "^" . $amount . "^", $signature_key);
}
return bin2hex(mhash(MHASH_SHA512, $api_login_id . "^" . $fp_sequence . "^" . $fp_timestamp . "^" . $amount . "^", $signature_key));
While getting reponse and comparing the x_sha_hash value
from md5 -
if(strtoupper(md5($this->md5_setting . $this->api_login_id . $this
->transaction_id . $amount)) == $this->md5_hash){
//valid
} else{
//not valid
}
Changed to sha512 -
$this->signature_key = hex2bin($this->signature_key);
$string = '^'.$this->api_login_id.'^'.$this->transaction_id.'^'.$amount.'^';
if(strtoupper(HASH_HMAC('sha512', $string, $this->signature_key)) == $this->SHA2_Hash){
//valid
} else{
//not valid
}
What I am doing wrong?
When validating the transaction at my end it is saying please check your md5 setting. It validates on the basis of last code shown in the snippet.
my signature Key = E284BDC12A45A7F5B0933A352EB1C3F25E91A3B92360693D94E4366190EF12E78F6CFE8601751F719DA7A72ABBA117BF0161F8A1DD894DADE3C56A838D8355AD
x_hp_hash submitting using the second code snippet (i.e sha512 fingerprint)
x_hp_hash = b4c9e1878f88aa9c4f808761ed8ceee71ab117cc0f1297b2d850e28351f08fc52bd528a7538c832568c674a1d5095ead1a5383a626c9797587ab16bae76e45fb
after submitting getting in reponse -
X_SHA2_Hash - 19AB7947709CF6CB2B8415784EBD7669FCDE5D83B69EC8C716203806A3235308187668F5783F9CA0F1AE8A47808EDAB241025A8AF61A2FABC27FA6AAAEA8FFD8
generated hash code -
3E6427E67271B1F0732D3D95217D25EE4D7C4103C906A6CB70943498698157F48F7BECD5C7E5393CF2A489B464070A7778F15757385E8F29029CFC3F66256F05
using last snippet above.
so these are not equal so not a valid transaction.
php payment-gateway authorize.net
I am updating the md5 to sha512 for DPM authorizenet-
Please help me out -
I am not getting it work.
see code change -
while generating fingerprint for x_hp_hash -
from md5 -
if (function_exists('hash_hmac')) {
return hash_hmac("md5", $api_login_id . "^" . $fp_sequence . "^" .
$fp_timestamp . "^" . $amount . "^", $transaction_key);
}
return bin2hex(mhash(MHASH_MD5, $api_login_id . "^" . $fp_sequence . "^" . $fp_timestamp . "^" . $amount . "^", $transaction_key));
to sha512 -
$signature_key = hex2bin($signature_key);
if (function_exists('hash_hmac')) {
return hash_hmac("sha512", $api_login_id . "^" . $fp_sequence . "^" .
$fp_timestamp . "^" . $amount . "^", $signature_key);
}
return bin2hex(mhash(MHASH_SHA512, $api_login_id . "^" . $fp_sequence . "^" . $fp_timestamp . "^" . $amount . "^", $signature_key));
While getting reponse and comparing the x_sha_hash value
from md5 -
if(strtoupper(md5($this->md5_setting . $this->api_login_id . $this
->transaction_id . $amount)) == $this->md5_hash){
//valid
} else{
//not valid
}
Changed to sha512 -
$this->signature_key = hex2bin($this->signature_key);
$string = '^'.$this->api_login_id.'^'.$this->transaction_id.'^'.$amount.'^';
if(strtoupper(HASH_HMAC('sha512', $string, $this->signature_key)) == $this->SHA2_Hash){
//valid
} else{
//not valid
}
What I am doing wrong?
When validating the transaction at my end it is saying please check your md5 setting. It validates on the basis of last code shown in the snippet.
my signature Key = E284BDC12A45A7F5B0933A352EB1C3F25E91A3B92360693D94E4366190EF12E78F6CFE8601751F719DA7A72ABBA117BF0161F8A1DD894DADE3C56A838D8355AD
x_hp_hash submitting using the second code snippet (i.e sha512 fingerprint)
x_hp_hash = b4c9e1878f88aa9c4f808761ed8ceee71ab117cc0f1297b2d850e28351f08fc52bd528a7538c832568c674a1d5095ead1a5383a626c9797587ab16bae76e45fb
after submitting getting in reponse -
X_SHA2_Hash - 19AB7947709CF6CB2B8415784EBD7669FCDE5D83B69EC8C716203806A3235308187668F5783F9CA0F1AE8A47808EDAB241025A8AF61A2FABC27FA6AAAEA8FFD8
generated hash code -
3E6427E67271B1F0732D3D95217D25EE4D7C4103C906A6CB70943498698157F48F7BECD5C7E5393CF2A489B464070A7778F15757385E8F29029CFC3F66256F05
using last snippet above.
so these are not equal so not a valid transaction.
php payment-gateway authorize.net
php payment-gateway authorize.net
edited Jan 21 at 6:13
Vikas Chauhan
asked Jan 18 at 14:37
Vikas ChauhanVikas Chauhan
1339
1339
2
What errors are you seeing? What is the question here? Edit the question and make sure it is clear what you are trying to do, and what results you get. Hint: if you make unit tests before your change you will have some baseline for the parts that break later.
– jdv
Jan 18 at 15:50
@jdv I have updated my question. Please have a look
– Vikas Chauhan
Jan 21 at 10:06
add a comment |
2
What errors are you seeing? What is the question here? Edit the question and make sure it is clear what you are trying to do, and what results you get. Hint: if you make unit tests before your change you will have some baseline for the parts that break later.
– jdv
Jan 18 at 15:50
@jdv I have updated my question. Please have a look
– Vikas Chauhan
Jan 21 at 10:06
2
2
What errors are you seeing? What is the question here? Edit the question and make sure it is clear what you are trying to do, and what results you get. Hint: if you make unit tests before your change you will have some baseline for the parts that break later.
– jdv
Jan 18 at 15:50
What errors are you seeing? What is the question here? Edit the question and make sure it is clear what you are trying to do, and what results you get. Hint: if you make unit tests before your change you will have some baseline for the parts that break later.
– jdv
Jan 18 at 15:50
@jdv I have updated my question. Please have a look
– Vikas Chauhan
Jan 21 at 10:06
@jdv I have updated my question. Please have a look
– Vikas Chauhan
Jan 21 at 10:06
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
I got it working
Thanks to the https://community.developer.authorize.net/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Working-php-hash-verification/td-p/65774/highlight/false
Instead of using only following three fields
$api_login_id
$transaction_id
$amount;
I had to use all the following fields see -
$hashData = implode('^', [
$_POST['x_trans_id'],
$_POST['x_test_request'],
$_POST['x_response_code'],
$_POST['x_auth_code'],
$_POST['x_cvv2_resp_code'],
$_POST['x_cavv_response'],
$_POST['x_avs_code'],
$_POST['x_method'],
$_POST['x_account_number'],
$_POST['x_amount'],
$_POST['x_company'],
$_POST['x_first_name'],
$_POST['x_last_name'],
$_POST['x_address'],
$_POST['x_city'],
$_POST['x_state'],
$_POST['x_zip'],
$_POST['x_country'],
$_POST['x_phone'],
$_POST['x_fax'],
$_POST['x_email'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_company'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_first_name'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_last_name'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_address'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_city'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_state'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_zip'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_country'],
$_POST['x_invoice_num'],
]);
$hash = hash_hmac('sha512', '^'.$hashData.'^', hex2bin($signatureKey));
$hash = strtoupper($hash);
if($this->SHA2_Hash === $hash) {
//valid
}
So use all the x_fields from authorize.net to generate hashcode
add a comment |
There is definitely a change in the logic for how this hash is calculated as simply changing md5
to sha215
does not work.
My original hash generation code for md5
(confirmed working):
$hash = hash_hmac('md5', sprintf('%s^%s^%s^%s^',
$login, // Authorize.Net API login ID
$sequence, // Random string
$timestamp, // time()
$amount // 1.00
), $this->transactionKey);
Here's the new code for sha512
(confirmed working):
$hash = hash_hmac('sha512', sprintf('%s^%s^%s^%s^',
$login, // Authorize.Net API login ID
$sequence, // Random string
$timestamp, // time()
$amount // 1.00
), hex2bin($signature));
You can see I had to switch out the transactionKey
and use the signature instead. I also had to convert it to binary using hex2bin()
.
There's a lot of useful, although messy, information about this on the Authorize.Net developer community forums.
I have used a signature key instead of transaction key but not generating the same.
– Vikas Chauhan
Jan 21 at 6:16
It doesn't look like you are converting the signature key to binary. Have you tried using my code to generate your hash?
– John Conde
Jan 21 at 12:24
Yes, I followed every step. Though I found a solution as wrote below.
– Vikas Chauhan
Jan 21 at 12:34
add a comment |
When using it in magento 1.9
In request function:
$signature_key = hex2bin('7FFA2F94DFC76BC5CEE0E5F6122E51FB2BB0B0743C4F30D561077F5A8F2F1649232B4486A18FAF3435E8A33E18C1D8F79CF5B12991BA954008AD5F54DDB915E6'); //from authorize.net
return hash_hmac("sha512",
$merchantApiLoginId . "^" .
$fpSequence . "^" .
$fpTimestamp . "^" .
$amount . "^".
$currencyCode. '^',
$signature_key
);
In response function:
$signature_key = hex2bin($merchantMd5);
$string = '^'.$merchantApiLogin.'^'.$transactionId.'^'.$amount.'^';
$generateHash = strtoupper(HASH_HMAC('sha512',
$string,
$signature_key
));
return hash_equals($generateHash,$this->getData('x_SHA2_Hash'));
I am getting transaction declined message:
x_response_code = 3
x_response_reason_code = 99
x_response_reason_text = (TEST MODE) This transaction cannot be accepted.
x_trans_id = 0
Is this due to test account ?
New contributor
FIrst - This is your question not answer Second - either it is test account or live account transaction will always be accepted. look for the sandbox account if it is set to live -> change it to test
– Vikas Chauhan
Jan 25 at 14:20
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54256127%2fupdating-md5-to-sha512-authorizenet%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I got it working
Thanks to the https://community.developer.authorize.net/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Working-php-hash-verification/td-p/65774/highlight/false
Instead of using only following three fields
$api_login_id
$transaction_id
$amount;
I had to use all the following fields see -
$hashData = implode('^', [
$_POST['x_trans_id'],
$_POST['x_test_request'],
$_POST['x_response_code'],
$_POST['x_auth_code'],
$_POST['x_cvv2_resp_code'],
$_POST['x_cavv_response'],
$_POST['x_avs_code'],
$_POST['x_method'],
$_POST['x_account_number'],
$_POST['x_amount'],
$_POST['x_company'],
$_POST['x_first_name'],
$_POST['x_last_name'],
$_POST['x_address'],
$_POST['x_city'],
$_POST['x_state'],
$_POST['x_zip'],
$_POST['x_country'],
$_POST['x_phone'],
$_POST['x_fax'],
$_POST['x_email'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_company'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_first_name'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_last_name'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_address'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_city'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_state'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_zip'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_country'],
$_POST['x_invoice_num'],
]);
$hash = hash_hmac('sha512', '^'.$hashData.'^', hex2bin($signatureKey));
$hash = strtoupper($hash);
if($this->SHA2_Hash === $hash) {
//valid
}
So use all the x_fields from authorize.net to generate hashcode
add a comment |
I got it working
Thanks to the https://community.developer.authorize.net/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Working-php-hash-verification/td-p/65774/highlight/false
Instead of using only following three fields
$api_login_id
$transaction_id
$amount;
I had to use all the following fields see -
$hashData = implode('^', [
$_POST['x_trans_id'],
$_POST['x_test_request'],
$_POST['x_response_code'],
$_POST['x_auth_code'],
$_POST['x_cvv2_resp_code'],
$_POST['x_cavv_response'],
$_POST['x_avs_code'],
$_POST['x_method'],
$_POST['x_account_number'],
$_POST['x_amount'],
$_POST['x_company'],
$_POST['x_first_name'],
$_POST['x_last_name'],
$_POST['x_address'],
$_POST['x_city'],
$_POST['x_state'],
$_POST['x_zip'],
$_POST['x_country'],
$_POST['x_phone'],
$_POST['x_fax'],
$_POST['x_email'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_company'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_first_name'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_last_name'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_address'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_city'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_state'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_zip'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_country'],
$_POST['x_invoice_num'],
]);
$hash = hash_hmac('sha512', '^'.$hashData.'^', hex2bin($signatureKey));
$hash = strtoupper($hash);
if($this->SHA2_Hash === $hash) {
//valid
}
So use all the x_fields from authorize.net to generate hashcode
add a comment |
I got it working
Thanks to the https://community.developer.authorize.net/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Working-php-hash-verification/td-p/65774/highlight/false
Instead of using only following three fields
$api_login_id
$transaction_id
$amount;
I had to use all the following fields see -
$hashData = implode('^', [
$_POST['x_trans_id'],
$_POST['x_test_request'],
$_POST['x_response_code'],
$_POST['x_auth_code'],
$_POST['x_cvv2_resp_code'],
$_POST['x_cavv_response'],
$_POST['x_avs_code'],
$_POST['x_method'],
$_POST['x_account_number'],
$_POST['x_amount'],
$_POST['x_company'],
$_POST['x_first_name'],
$_POST['x_last_name'],
$_POST['x_address'],
$_POST['x_city'],
$_POST['x_state'],
$_POST['x_zip'],
$_POST['x_country'],
$_POST['x_phone'],
$_POST['x_fax'],
$_POST['x_email'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_company'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_first_name'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_last_name'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_address'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_city'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_state'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_zip'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_country'],
$_POST['x_invoice_num'],
]);
$hash = hash_hmac('sha512', '^'.$hashData.'^', hex2bin($signatureKey));
$hash = strtoupper($hash);
if($this->SHA2_Hash === $hash) {
//valid
}
So use all the x_fields from authorize.net to generate hashcode
I got it working
Thanks to the https://community.developer.authorize.net/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Working-php-hash-verification/td-p/65774/highlight/false
Instead of using only following three fields
$api_login_id
$transaction_id
$amount;
I had to use all the following fields see -
$hashData = implode('^', [
$_POST['x_trans_id'],
$_POST['x_test_request'],
$_POST['x_response_code'],
$_POST['x_auth_code'],
$_POST['x_cvv2_resp_code'],
$_POST['x_cavv_response'],
$_POST['x_avs_code'],
$_POST['x_method'],
$_POST['x_account_number'],
$_POST['x_amount'],
$_POST['x_company'],
$_POST['x_first_name'],
$_POST['x_last_name'],
$_POST['x_address'],
$_POST['x_city'],
$_POST['x_state'],
$_POST['x_zip'],
$_POST['x_country'],
$_POST['x_phone'],
$_POST['x_fax'],
$_POST['x_email'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_company'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_first_name'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_last_name'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_address'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_city'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_state'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_zip'],
$_POST['x_ship_to_country'],
$_POST['x_invoice_num'],
]);
$hash = hash_hmac('sha512', '^'.$hashData.'^', hex2bin($signatureKey));
$hash = strtoupper($hash);
if($this->SHA2_Hash === $hash) {
//valid
}
So use all the x_fields from authorize.net to generate hashcode
answered Jan 21 at 12:43
Vikas ChauhanVikas Chauhan
1339
1339
add a comment |
add a comment |
There is definitely a change in the logic for how this hash is calculated as simply changing md5
to sha215
does not work.
My original hash generation code for md5
(confirmed working):
$hash = hash_hmac('md5', sprintf('%s^%s^%s^%s^',
$login, // Authorize.Net API login ID
$sequence, // Random string
$timestamp, // time()
$amount // 1.00
), $this->transactionKey);
Here's the new code for sha512
(confirmed working):
$hash = hash_hmac('sha512', sprintf('%s^%s^%s^%s^',
$login, // Authorize.Net API login ID
$sequence, // Random string
$timestamp, // time()
$amount // 1.00
), hex2bin($signature));
You can see I had to switch out the transactionKey
and use the signature instead. I also had to convert it to binary using hex2bin()
.
There's a lot of useful, although messy, information about this on the Authorize.Net developer community forums.
I have used a signature key instead of transaction key but not generating the same.
– Vikas Chauhan
Jan 21 at 6:16
It doesn't look like you are converting the signature key to binary. Have you tried using my code to generate your hash?
– John Conde
Jan 21 at 12:24
Yes, I followed every step. Though I found a solution as wrote below.
– Vikas Chauhan
Jan 21 at 12:34
add a comment |
There is definitely a change in the logic for how this hash is calculated as simply changing md5
to sha215
does not work.
My original hash generation code for md5
(confirmed working):
$hash = hash_hmac('md5', sprintf('%s^%s^%s^%s^',
$login, // Authorize.Net API login ID
$sequence, // Random string
$timestamp, // time()
$amount // 1.00
), $this->transactionKey);
Here's the new code for sha512
(confirmed working):
$hash = hash_hmac('sha512', sprintf('%s^%s^%s^%s^',
$login, // Authorize.Net API login ID
$sequence, // Random string
$timestamp, // time()
$amount // 1.00
), hex2bin($signature));
You can see I had to switch out the transactionKey
and use the signature instead. I also had to convert it to binary using hex2bin()
.
There's a lot of useful, although messy, information about this on the Authorize.Net developer community forums.
I have used a signature key instead of transaction key but not generating the same.
– Vikas Chauhan
Jan 21 at 6:16
It doesn't look like you are converting the signature key to binary. Have you tried using my code to generate your hash?
– John Conde
Jan 21 at 12:24
Yes, I followed every step. Though I found a solution as wrote below.
– Vikas Chauhan
Jan 21 at 12:34
add a comment |
There is definitely a change in the logic for how this hash is calculated as simply changing md5
to sha215
does not work.
My original hash generation code for md5
(confirmed working):
$hash = hash_hmac('md5', sprintf('%s^%s^%s^%s^',
$login, // Authorize.Net API login ID
$sequence, // Random string
$timestamp, // time()
$amount // 1.00
), $this->transactionKey);
Here's the new code for sha512
(confirmed working):
$hash = hash_hmac('sha512', sprintf('%s^%s^%s^%s^',
$login, // Authorize.Net API login ID
$sequence, // Random string
$timestamp, // time()
$amount // 1.00
), hex2bin($signature));
You can see I had to switch out the transactionKey
and use the signature instead. I also had to convert it to binary using hex2bin()
.
There's a lot of useful, although messy, information about this on the Authorize.Net developer community forums.
There is definitely a change in the logic for how this hash is calculated as simply changing md5
to sha215
does not work.
My original hash generation code for md5
(confirmed working):
$hash = hash_hmac('md5', sprintf('%s^%s^%s^%s^',
$login, // Authorize.Net API login ID
$sequence, // Random string
$timestamp, // time()
$amount // 1.00
), $this->transactionKey);
Here's the new code for sha512
(confirmed working):
$hash = hash_hmac('sha512', sprintf('%s^%s^%s^%s^',
$login, // Authorize.Net API login ID
$sequence, // Random string
$timestamp, // time()
$amount // 1.00
), hex2bin($signature));
You can see I had to switch out the transactionKey
and use the signature instead. I also had to convert it to binary using hex2bin()
.
There's a lot of useful, although messy, information about this on the Authorize.Net developer community forums.
edited Jan 19 at 17:33
answered Jan 19 at 16:28
John CondeJohn Conde
185k80370422
185k80370422
I have used a signature key instead of transaction key but not generating the same.
– Vikas Chauhan
Jan 21 at 6:16
It doesn't look like you are converting the signature key to binary. Have you tried using my code to generate your hash?
– John Conde
Jan 21 at 12:24
Yes, I followed every step. Though I found a solution as wrote below.
– Vikas Chauhan
Jan 21 at 12:34
add a comment |
I have used a signature key instead of transaction key but not generating the same.
– Vikas Chauhan
Jan 21 at 6:16
It doesn't look like you are converting the signature key to binary. Have you tried using my code to generate your hash?
– John Conde
Jan 21 at 12:24
Yes, I followed every step. Though I found a solution as wrote below.
– Vikas Chauhan
Jan 21 at 12:34
I have used a signature key instead of transaction key but not generating the same.
– Vikas Chauhan
Jan 21 at 6:16
I have used a signature key instead of transaction key but not generating the same.
– Vikas Chauhan
Jan 21 at 6:16
It doesn't look like you are converting the signature key to binary. Have you tried using my code to generate your hash?
– John Conde
Jan 21 at 12:24
It doesn't look like you are converting the signature key to binary. Have you tried using my code to generate your hash?
– John Conde
Jan 21 at 12:24
Yes, I followed every step. Though I found a solution as wrote below.
– Vikas Chauhan
Jan 21 at 12:34
Yes, I followed every step. Though I found a solution as wrote below.
– Vikas Chauhan
Jan 21 at 12:34
add a comment |
When using it in magento 1.9
In request function:
$signature_key = hex2bin('7FFA2F94DFC76BC5CEE0E5F6122E51FB2BB0B0743C4F30D561077F5A8F2F1649232B4486A18FAF3435E8A33E18C1D8F79CF5B12991BA954008AD5F54DDB915E6'); //from authorize.net
return hash_hmac("sha512",
$merchantApiLoginId . "^" .
$fpSequence . "^" .
$fpTimestamp . "^" .
$amount . "^".
$currencyCode. '^',
$signature_key
);
In response function:
$signature_key = hex2bin($merchantMd5);
$string = '^'.$merchantApiLogin.'^'.$transactionId.'^'.$amount.'^';
$generateHash = strtoupper(HASH_HMAC('sha512',
$string,
$signature_key
));
return hash_equals($generateHash,$this->getData('x_SHA2_Hash'));
I am getting transaction declined message:
x_response_code = 3
x_response_reason_code = 99
x_response_reason_text = (TEST MODE) This transaction cannot be accepted.
x_trans_id = 0
Is this due to test account ?
New contributor
FIrst - This is your question not answer Second - either it is test account or live account transaction will always be accepted. look for the sandbox account if it is set to live -> change it to test
– Vikas Chauhan
Jan 25 at 14:20
add a comment |
When using it in magento 1.9
In request function:
$signature_key = hex2bin('7FFA2F94DFC76BC5CEE0E5F6122E51FB2BB0B0743C4F30D561077F5A8F2F1649232B4486A18FAF3435E8A33E18C1D8F79CF5B12991BA954008AD5F54DDB915E6'); //from authorize.net
return hash_hmac("sha512",
$merchantApiLoginId . "^" .
$fpSequence . "^" .
$fpTimestamp . "^" .
$amount . "^".
$currencyCode. '^',
$signature_key
);
In response function:
$signature_key = hex2bin($merchantMd5);
$string = '^'.$merchantApiLogin.'^'.$transactionId.'^'.$amount.'^';
$generateHash = strtoupper(HASH_HMAC('sha512',
$string,
$signature_key
));
return hash_equals($generateHash,$this->getData('x_SHA2_Hash'));
I am getting transaction declined message:
x_response_code = 3
x_response_reason_code = 99
x_response_reason_text = (TEST MODE) This transaction cannot be accepted.
x_trans_id = 0
Is this due to test account ?
New contributor
FIrst - This is your question not answer Second - either it is test account or live account transaction will always be accepted. look for the sandbox account if it is set to live -> change it to test
– Vikas Chauhan
Jan 25 at 14:20
add a comment |
When using it in magento 1.9
In request function:
$signature_key = hex2bin('7FFA2F94DFC76BC5CEE0E5F6122E51FB2BB0B0743C4F30D561077F5A8F2F1649232B4486A18FAF3435E8A33E18C1D8F79CF5B12991BA954008AD5F54DDB915E6'); //from authorize.net
return hash_hmac("sha512",
$merchantApiLoginId . "^" .
$fpSequence . "^" .
$fpTimestamp . "^" .
$amount . "^".
$currencyCode. '^',
$signature_key
);
In response function:
$signature_key = hex2bin($merchantMd5);
$string = '^'.$merchantApiLogin.'^'.$transactionId.'^'.$amount.'^';
$generateHash = strtoupper(HASH_HMAC('sha512',
$string,
$signature_key
));
return hash_equals($generateHash,$this->getData('x_SHA2_Hash'));
I am getting transaction declined message:
x_response_code = 3
x_response_reason_code = 99
x_response_reason_text = (TEST MODE) This transaction cannot be accepted.
x_trans_id = 0
Is this due to test account ?
New contributor
When using it in magento 1.9
In request function:
$signature_key = hex2bin('7FFA2F94DFC76BC5CEE0E5F6122E51FB2BB0B0743C4F30D561077F5A8F2F1649232B4486A18FAF3435E8A33E18C1D8F79CF5B12991BA954008AD5F54DDB915E6'); //from authorize.net
return hash_hmac("sha512",
$merchantApiLoginId . "^" .
$fpSequence . "^" .
$fpTimestamp . "^" .
$amount . "^".
$currencyCode. '^',
$signature_key
);
In response function:
$signature_key = hex2bin($merchantMd5);
$string = '^'.$merchantApiLogin.'^'.$transactionId.'^'.$amount.'^';
$generateHash = strtoupper(HASH_HMAC('sha512',
$string,
$signature_key
));
return hash_equals($generateHash,$this->getData('x_SHA2_Hash'));
I am getting transaction declined message:
x_response_code = 3
x_response_reason_code = 99
x_response_reason_text = (TEST MODE) This transaction cannot be accepted.
x_trans_id = 0
Is this due to test account ?
New contributor
edited Jan 25 at 14:33
Stoogy
648622
648622
New contributor
answered Jan 25 at 13:53
Sharif KareemSharif Kareem
12
12
New contributor
New contributor
FIrst - This is your question not answer Second - either it is test account or live account transaction will always be accepted. look for the sandbox account if it is set to live -> change it to test
– Vikas Chauhan
Jan 25 at 14:20
add a comment |
FIrst - This is your question not answer Second - either it is test account or live account transaction will always be accepted. look for the sandbox account if it is set to live -> change it to test
– Vikas Chauhan
Jan 25 at 14:20
FIrst - This is your question not answer Second - either it is test account or live account transaction will always be accepted. look for the sandbox account if it is set to live -> change it to test
– Vikas Chauhan
Jan 25 at 14:20
FIrst - This is your question not answer Second - either it is test account or live account transaction will always be accepted. look for the sandbox account if it is set to live -> change it to test
– Vikas Chauhan
Jan 25 at 14:20
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54256127%2fupdating-md5-to-sha512-authorizenet%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
What errors are you seeing? What is the question here? Edit the question and make sure it is clear what you are trying to do, and what results you get. Hint: if you make unit tests before your change you will have some baseline for the parts that break later.
– jdv
Jan 18 at 15:50
@jdv I have updated my question. Please have a look
– Vikas Chauhan
Jan 21 at 10:06