Eclipse The hierarchy of type VerificationTokenRepository is inconsistent
I have the following project structure:
P - Parent Module
A - Module A with parent P
B - Module B with parent P and depends on A (no module-info)
In module A I have the following interfaces:
public interface IRepository<T, K extends Serializable> extends JpaRepository<T, K>
public interface IIdRepository<T> extends IRepository<T, Long> {/* */}
public interface ITokenRepository<T extends AbstractToken> extends IIdRepository<T>
and in Module B I have the following interface:
public interface VerificationTokenRepository<T extends VerificationToken> extends ITokenRepository<T>{
This last interface is the one that gets the subject message. None of the interfaces in Module A cause any errors. All the dependencies in the pom for Module A exist in the pom for Module B and Module B has Module A as a dependency. If I change the definition fo VerificationTokenRegistry so that it extends each of the other interfaces, I still get the same error. If it extends JpaRepository I get no error. I have cleaned, installed, and deployed each of the dependencies. I have restarted Eclipse. But that doesn't help.
Additionally, the error occurs only in the editor window. It does not appear in the Problem window, the Marker window and is not flagged in the Package Explorer window.
The error occurs in the same way for all the interfaces defined in Module B which extend interfaces in Module A.
java eclipse
asked Dec 21 '18 at 3:53
AixNPanesAixNPanes
4981715
add a comment |
I have the following project structure:
P - Parent Module
A - Module A with parent P
B - Module B with parent P and depends on A (no module-info)
In module A I have the following interfaces:
public interface IRepository<T, K extends Serializable> extends JpaRepository<T, K>
public interface IIdRepository<T> extends IRepository<T, Long> {/* */}
public interface ITokenRepository<T extends AbstractToken> extends IIdRepository<T>
and in Module B I have the following interface:
public interface VerificationTokenRepository<T extends VerificationToken> extends ITokenRepository<T>{
This last interface is the one that gets the subject message. None of the interfaces in Module A cause any errors. All the dependencies in the pom for Module A exist in the pom for Module B and Module B has Module A as a dependency. If I change the definition fo VerificationTokenRegistry so that it extends each of the other interfaces, I still get the same error. If it extends JpaRepository I get no error. I have cleaned, installed, and deployed each of the dependencies. I have restarted Eclipse. But that doesn't help.
Additionally, the error occurs only in the editor window. It does not appear in the Problem window, the Marker window and is not flagged in the Package Explorer window.
The error occurs in the same way for all the interfaces defined in Module B which extend interfaces in Module A.
java eclipse
asked Dec 21 '18 at 3:53
AixNPanesAixNPanes
4981715
add a comment |
I have the following project structure:
P - Parent Module
A - Module A with parent P
B - Module B with parent P and depends on A (no module-info)
In module A I have the following interfaces:
public interface IRepository<T, K extends Serializable> extends JpaRepository<T, K>
public interface IIdRepository<T> extends IRepository<T, Long> {/* */}
public interface ITokenRepository<T extends AbstractToken> extends IIdRepository<T>
and in Module B I have the following interface:
public interface VerificationTokenRepository<T extends VerificationToken> extends ITokenRepository<T>{
This last interface is the one that gets the subject message. None of the interfaces in Module A cause any errors. All the dependencies in the pom for Module A exist in the pom for Module B and Module B has Module A as a dependency. If I change the definition fo VerificationTokenRegistry so that it extends each of the other interfaces, I still get the same error. If it extends JpaRepository I get no error. I have cleaned, installed, and deployed each of the dependencies. I have restarted Eclipse. But that doesn't help.
Additionally, the error occurs only in the editor window. It does not appear in the Problem window, the Marker window and is not flagged in the Package Explorer window.
The error occurs in the same way for all the interfaces defined in Module B which extend interfaces in Module A.
java eclipse
asked Dec 21 '18 at 3:53
AixNPanesAixNPanes
4981715
I have the following project structure:
P - Parent Module
A - Module A with parent P
B - Module B with parent P and depends on A (no module-info)
In module A I have the following interfaces:
public interface IRepository<T, K extends Serializable> extends JpaRepository<T, K>
public interface IIdRepository<T> extends IRepository<T, Long> {/* */}
public interface ITokenRepository<T extends AbstractToken> extends IIdRepository<T>
and in Module B I have the following interface:
public interface VerificationTokenRepository<T extends VerificationToken> extends ITokenRepository<T>{
This last interface is the one that gets the subject message. None of the interfaces in Module A cause any errors. All the dependencies in the pom for Module A exist in the pom for Module B and Module B has Module A as a dependency. If I change the definition fo VerificationTokenRegistry so that it extends each of the other interfaces, I still get the same error. If it extends JpaRepository I get no error. I have cleaned, installed, and deployed each of the dependencies. I have restarted Eclipse. But that doesn't help.
Additionally, the error occurs only in the editor window. It does not appear in the Problem window, the Marker window and is not flagged in the Package Explorer window.
The error occurs in the same way for all the interfaces defined in Module B which extend interfaces in Module A.
java eclipse
java eclipse
asked Dec 21 '18 at 3:53
AixNPanesAixNPanes
4981715
asked Dec 21 '18 at 3:53
AixNPanesAixNPanes
4981715
asked Dec 21 '18 at 3:53
AixNPanesAixNPanes
4981715
asked Dec 21 '18 at 3:53
AixNPanesAixNPanes
4981715
asked Dec 21 '18 at 3:53
AixNPanesAixNPanes
4981715
4981715
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I found that one way to bypass the problem is to separate the offending code into a separate module. The validation module doesn't seem to have a problem if that is done. I assume that is because the amount of code in the module is small.
answered Jan 19 at 3:12
AixNPanesAixNPanes
4981715
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53878950%2feclipse-the-hierarchy-of-type-verificationtokenrepository-is-inconsistent%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I found that one way to bypass the problem is to separate the offending code into a separate module. The validation module doesn't seem to have a problem if that is done. I assume that is because the amount of code in the module is small.
answered Jan 19 at 3:12
AixNPanesAixNPanes
4981715
add a comment |
I found that one way to bypass the problem is to separate the offending code into a separate module. The validation module doesn't seem to have a problem if that is done. I assume that is because the amount of code in the module is small.
answered Jan 19 at 3:12
AixNPanesAixNPanes
4981715
add a comment |
I found that one way to bypass the problem is to separate the offending code into a separate module. The validation module doesn't seem to have a problem if that is done. I assume that is because the amount of code in the module is small.
answered Jan 19 at 3:12
AixNPanesAixNPanes
4981715
I found that one way to bypass the problem is to separate the offending code into a separate module. The validation module doesn't seem to have a problem if that is done. I assume that is because the amount of code in the module is small.
answered Jan 19 at 3:12
AixNPanesAixNPanes
4981715
answered Jan 19 at 3:12
AixNPanesAixNPanes
4981715
answered Jan 19 at 3:12
AixNPanesAixNPanes
4981715
answered Jan 19 at 3:12
AixNPanesAixNPanes
4981715
4981715
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53878950%2feclipse-the-hierarchy-of-type-verificationtokenrepository-is-inconsistent%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
