Create new Dictionary with group and count based on existing Dictionary with tuple












-3















I have the current Dictionary testdict:



Dictionary<int, Tuple<int, string, string>> testdict


Which is basically a Dictionary<autoID, Tuple<ignore, "shortcode", "product_name">>



Example:



testdict.Add(1, new Tuple<int, string, string>(1, "555", "Light Blue"));
testdict.Add(2, new Tuple<int, string, string>(2, "122", "Majenta Red"));
testdict.Add(3, new Tuple<int, string, string>(2, "133", "Dark Yellow"));
testdict.Add(4, new Tuple<int, string, string>(1, "555", "Light Blue"));
testdict.Add(5, new Tuple<int, string, string>(1, "555", "Light Blue"));
testdict.Add(6, new Tuple<int, string, string>(2, "133", "Dark Yellow"));
testdict.Add(7, new Tuple<int, string, string>(2, "766", "Purple"));


I need a new container that has this format:



autoid, "shortcode" group, "product_name" group, "count"


shortcode and product name always match, so they can be both grouped or group one and select any occurence of the second (first for example).
The int key can be ignored (it's just to create an order).
The int inside the tuple is also to be ignored.



An example of the new container I need would be:



Dictionary<int, Tuple<string, string, int>> newdict
newdict.Add(AutoID_Order, new Tuple<string, string, int>("shortcode", "product_name", count)); (structure)
newdict.Add(1, new Tuple<string, string, int>("555", "Light Blue", 3));
newdict.Add(2, new Tuple<string, string, int>("133", "Dark Yellow", 2));
newdict.Add(3, new Tuple<string, string, int>("122", "Majenta Red", 1));
newdict.Add(4, new Tuple<string, string, int>("766", "Purple", 1));


How can I accomplish this? Linq is acceptable.










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because: We are not here to do your job for you. Show us your efforts (that you've tried at least something).

    – Fabjan
    Jan 20 at 14:27













  • Found two questions in SO about grouping and counting with dicts, but none similar to this one. Always resulted in error converting one format to the other. I really appreciate the help from the two users who answered, and perhaps this will help other users in the future. Sorry for not posting the results from my attempts.

    – João Gomes
    Jan 20 at 15:24
















-3















I have the current Dictionary testdict:



Dictionary<int, Tuple<int, string, string>> testdict


Which is basically a Dictionary<autoID, Tuple<ignore, "shortcode", "product_name">>



Example:



testdict.Add(1, new Tuple<int, string, string>(1, "555", "Light Blue"));
testdict.Add(2, new Tuple<int, string, string>(2, "122", "Majenta Red"));
testdict.Add(3, new Tuple<int, string, string>(2, "133", "Dark Yellow"));
testdict.Add(4, new Tuple<int, string, string>(1, "555", "Light Blue"));
testdict.Add(5, new Tuple<int, string, string>(1, "555", "Light Blue"));
testdict.Add(6, new Tuple<int, string, string>(2, "133", "Dark Yellow"));
testdict.Add(7, new Tuple<int, string, string>(2, "766", "Purple"));


I need a new container that has this format:



autoid, "shortcode" group, "product_name" group, "count"


shortcode and product name always match, so they can be both grouped or group one and select any occurence of the second (first for example).
The int key can be ignored (it's just to create an order).
The int inside the tuple is also to be ignored.



An example of the new container I need would be:



Dictionary<int, Tuple<string, string, int>> newdict
newdict.Add(AutoID_Order, new Tuple<string, string, int>("shortcode", "product_name", count)); (structure)
newdict.Add(1, new Tuple<string, string, int>("555", "Light Blue", 3));
newdict.Add(2, new Tuple<string, string, int>("133", "Dark Yellow", 2));
newdict.Add(3, new Tuple<string, string, int>("122", "Majenta Red", 1));
newdict.Add(4, new Tuple<string, string, int>("766", "Purple", 1));


How can I accomplish this? Linq is acceptable.










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because: We are not here to do your job for you. Show us your efforts (that you've tried at least something).

    – Fabjan
    Jan 20 at 14:27













  • Found two questions in SO about grouping and counting with dicts, but none similar to this one. Always resulted in error converting one format to the other. I really appreciate the help from the two users who answered, and perhaps this will help other users in the future. Sorry for not posting the results from my attempts.

    – João Gomes
    Jan 20 at 15:24














-3












-3








-3








I have the current Dictionary testdict:



Dictionary<int, Tuple<int, string, string>> testdict


Which is basically a Dictionary<autoID, Tuple<ignore, "shortcode", "product_name">>



Example:



testdict.Add(1, new Tuple<int, string, string>(1, "555", "Light Blue"));
testdict.Add(2, new Tuple<int, string, string>(2, "122", "Majenta Red"));
testdict.Add(3, new Tuple<int, string, string>(2, "133", "Dark Yellow"));
testdict.Add(4, new Tuple<int, string, string>(1, "555", "Light Blue"));
testdict.Add(5, new Tuple<int, string, string>(1, "555", "Light Blue"));
testdict.Add(6, new Tuple<int, string, string>(2, "133", "Dark Yellow"));
testdict.Add(7, new Tuple<int, string, string>(2, "766", "Purple"));


I need a new container that has this format:



autoid, "shortcode" group, "product_name" group, "count"


shortcode and product name always match, so they can be both grouped or group one and select any occurence of the second (first for example).
The int key can be ignored (it's just to create an order).
The int inside the tuple is also to be ignored.



An example of the new container I need would be:



Dictionary<int, Tuple<string, string, int>> newdict
newdict.Add(AutoID_Order, new Tuple<string, string, int>("shortcode", "product_name", count)); (structure)
newdict.Add(1, new Tuple<string, string, int>("555", "Light Blue", 3));
newdict.Add(2, new Tuple<string, string, int>("133", "Dark Yellow", 2));
newdict.Add(3, new Tuple<string, string, int>("122", "Majenta Red", 1));
newdict.Add(4, new Tuple<string, string, int>("766", "Purple", 1));


How can I accomplish this? Linq is acceptable.










share|improve this question
















I have the current Dictionary testdict:



Dictionary<int, Tuple<int, string, string>> testdict


Which is basically a Dictionary<autoID, Tuple<ignore, "shortcode", "product_name">>



Example:



testdict.Add(1, new Tuple<int, string, string>(1, "555", "Light Blue"));
testdict.Add(2, new Tuple<int, string, string>(2, "122", "Majenta Red"));
testdict.Add(3, new Tuple<int, string, string>(2, "133", "Dark Yellow"));
testdict.Add(4, new Tuple<int, string, string>(1, "555", "Light Blue"));
testdict.Add(5, new Tuple<int, string, string>(1, "555", "Light Blue"));
testdict.Add(6, new Tuple<int, string, string>(2, "133", "Dark Yellow"));
testdict.Add(7, new Tuple<int, string, string>(2, "766", "Purple"));


I need a new container that has this format:



autoid, "shortcode" group, "product_name" group, "count"


shortcode and product name always match, so they can be both grouped or group one and select any occurence of the second (first for example).
The int key can be ignored (it's just to create an order).
The int inside the tuple is also to be ignored.



An example of the new container I need would be:



Dictionary<int, Tuple<string, string, int>> newdict
newdict.Add(AutoID_Order, new Tuple<string, string, int>("shortcode", "product_name", count)); (structure)
newdict.Add(1, new Tuple<string, string, int>("555", "Light Blue", 3));
newdict.Add(2, new Tuple<string, string, int>("133", "Dark Yellow", 2));
newdict.Add(3, new Tuple<string, string, int>("122", "Majenta Red", 1));
newdict.Add(4, new Tuple<string, string, int>("766", "Purple", 1));


How can I accomplish this? Linq is acceptable.







c#






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 20 at 14:12









Camilo Terevinto

18.4k63666




18.4k63666










asked Jan 20 at 14:09









João GomesJoão Gomes

12710




12710








  • 1





    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because: We are not here to do your job for you. Show us your efforts (that you've tried at least something).

    – Fabjan
    Jan 20 at 14:27













  • Found two questions in SO about grouping and counting with dicts, but none similar to this one. Always resulted in error converting one format to the other. I really appreciate the help from the two users who answered, and perhaps this will help other users in the future. Sorry for not posting the results from my attempts.

    – João Gomes
    Jan 20 at 15:24














  • 1





    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because: We are not here to do your job for you. Show us your efforts (that you've tried at least something).

    – Fabjan
    Jan 20 at 14:27













  • Found two questions in SO about grouping and counting with dicts, but none similar to this one. Always resulted in error converting one format to the other. I really appreciate the help from the two users who answered, and perhaps this will help other users in the future. Sorry for not posting the results from my attempts.

    – João Gomes
    Jan 20 at 15:24








1




1





I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because: We are not here to do your job for you. Show us your efforts (that you've tried at least something).

– Fabjan
Jan 20 at 14:27







I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because: We are not here to do your job for you. Show us your efforts (that you've tried at least something).

– Fabjan
Jan 20 at 14:27















Found two questions in SO about grouping and counting with dicts, but none similar to this one. Always resulted in error converting one format to the other. I really appreciate the help from the two users who answered, and perhaps this will help other users in the future. Sorry for not posting the results from my attempts.

– João Gomes
Jan 20 at 15:24





Found two questions in SO about grouping and counting with dicts, but none similar to this one. Always resulted in error converting one format to the other. I really appreciate the help from the two users who answered, and perhaps this will help other users in the future. Sorry for not posting the results from my attempts.

– João Gomes
Jan 20 at 15:24












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1














int count=0;        
var z = testdict
.GroupBy(x => new { x.Value.Item2, x.Value.Item3 })
.ToDictionary(x => ++count,
x => new Tuple<string, string, int>
(
x.Key.Item2, x.Key.Item3, x.Count()
));





share|improve this answer


























  • Thanks. Works fine. Only missing the orderby count, but I can do that in the view.

    – João Gomes
    Jan 20 at 15:15













  • An .OrderByDescending(x => x.Count()) bellow the groupby also solves it.

    – João Gomes
    Jan 20 at 15:51











  • That will be IGrouped items. How in the world is that equivalent to Dictionary<int, Tuple<string, string, int>> newdict. Wtever you do , at the end you have to use .ToDictionary` and count is just a variable here to index your results. There are probably better ways than using count variable to index but i don't know rit now.

    – Sumit raj
    Jan 20 at 15:55













  • Sorry, but I don't understand your comment. The count I needed ordering is the x.Count() and not the count var. Don't needed it to be a proper ordered container, but since they are sent to the view in the same order they are inserted to the dict, it's enough. The way you wrote it works wonderfully.

    – João Gomes
    Jan 20 at 16:17











  • It’s ok. If this works for u , then all ok

    – Sumit raj
    Jan 20 at 16:19



















1














Use GroupBy and then use ToDictionary



testdict
.GroupBy(x => new { x.Value.Item2, x.Value.Item3 })
.Select((x, i) => new {
i,
ShortCode = x.Key.Item2,
ProductName = x.Key.Item3,
Count = x.Count(),
})
.ToDictionary(x => x.i, x => new Tuple<string, string, int>(x.ShortCode, x.ProductName, x.Count));





share|improve this answer


























  • Instead of that First, why don't you GroupBy by the two properties? Then just use Key.Item1 and Key.Item2

    – Camilo Terevinto
    Jan 20 at 14:32











  • Can't quite figure this: error CS0029: Cannot implicitly convert type 'System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary>' to 'System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary>'

    – João Gomes
    Jan 20 at 15:16











  • @CamiloTerevinto, thanks... updated answer accordingly

    – user2321864
    Jan 21 at 8:47











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54277285%2fcreate-new-dictionary-with-group-and-count-based-on-existing-dictionary-with-tup%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














int count=0;        
var z = testdict
.GroupBy(x => new { x.Value.Item2, x.Value.Item3 })
.ToDictionary(x => ++count,
x => new Tuple<string, string, int>
(
x.Key.Item2, x.Key.Item3, x.Count()
));





share|improve this answer


























  • Thanks. Works fine. Only missing the orderby count, but I can do that in the view.

    – João Gomes
    Jan 20 at 15:15













  • An .OrderByDescending(x => x.Count()) bellow the groupby also solves it.

    – João Gomes
    Jan 20 at 15:51











  • That will be IGrouped items. How in the world is that equivalent to Dictionary<int, Tuple<string, string, int>> newdict. Wtever you do , at the end you have to use .ToDictionary` and count is just a variable here to index your results. There are probably better ways than using count variable to index but i don't know rit now.

    – Sumit raj
    Jan 20 at 15:55













  • Sorry, but I don't understand your comment. The count I needed ordering is the x.Count() and not the count var. Don't needed it to be a proper ordered container, but since they are sent to the view in the same order they are inserted to the dict, it's enough. The way you wrote it works wonderfully.

    – João Gomes
    Jan 20 at 16:17











  • It’s ok. If this works for u , then all ok

    – Sumit raj
    Jan 20 at 16:19
















1














int count=0;        
var z = testdict
.GroupBy(x => new { x.Value.Item2, x.Value.Item3 })
.ToDictionary(x => ++count,
x => new Tuple<string, string, int>
(
x.Key.Item2, x.Key.Item3, x.Count()
));





share|improve this answer


























  • Thanks. Works fine. Only missing the orderby count, but I can do that in the view.

    – João Gomes
    Jan 20 at 15:15













  • An .OrderByDescending(x => x.Count()) bellow the groupby also solves it.

    – João Gomes
    Jan 20 at 15:51











  • That will be IGrouped items. How in the world is that equivalent to Dictionary<int, Tuple<string, string, int>> newdict. Wtever you do , at the end you have to use .ToDictionary` and count is just a variable here to index your results. There are probably better ways than using count variable to index but i don't know rit now.

    – Sumit raj
    Jan 20 at 15:55













  • Sorry, but I don't understand your comment. The count I needed ordering is the x.Count() and not the count var. Don't needed it to be a proper ordered container, but since they are sent to the view in the same order they are inserted to the dict, it's enough. The way you wrote it works wonderfully.

    – João Gomes
    Jan 20 at 16:17











  • It’s ok. If this works for u , then all ok

    – Sumit raj
    Jan 20 at 16:19














1












1








1







int count=0;        
var z = testdict
.GroupBy(x => new { x.Value.Item2, x.Value.Item3 })
.ToDictionary(x => ++count,
x => new Tuple<string, string, int>
(
x.Key.Item2, x.Key.Item3, x.Count()
));





share|improve this answer















int count=0;        
var z = testdict
.GroupBy(x => new { x.Value.Item2, x.Value.Item3 })
.ToDictionary(x => ++count,
x => new Tuple<string, string, int>
(
x.Key.Item2, x.Key.Item3, x.Count()
));






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Jan 20 at 14:36

























answered Jan 20 at 14:26









Sumit rajSumit raj

8021413




8021413













  • Thanks. Works fine. Only missing the orderby count, but I can do that in the view.

    – João Gomes
    Jan 20 at 15:15













  • An .OrderByDescending(x => x.Count()) bellow the groupby also solves it.

    – João Gomes
    Jan 20 at 15:51











  • That will be IGrouped items. How in the world is that equivalent to Dictionary<int, Tuple<string, string, int>> newdict. Wtever you do , at the end you have to use .ToDictionary` and count is just a variable here to index your results. There are probably better ways than using count variable to index but i don't know rit now.

    – Sumit raj
    Jan 20 at 15:55













  • Sorry, but I don't understand your comment. The count I needed ordering is the x.Count() and not the count var. Don't needed it to be a proper ordered container, but since they are sent to the view in the same order they are inserted to the dict, it's enough. The way you wrote it works wonderfully.

    – João Gomes
    Jan 20 at 16:17











  • It’s ok. If this works for u , then all ok

    – Sumit raj
    Jan 20 at 16:19



















  • Thanks. Works fine. Only missing the orderby count, but I can do that in the view.

    – João Gomes
    Jan 20 at 15:15













  • An .OrderByDescending(x => x.Count()) bellow the groupby also solves it.

    – João Gomes
    Jan 20 at 15:51











  • That will be IGrouped items. How in the world is that equivalent to Dictionary<int, Tuple<string, string, int>> newdict. Wtever you do , at the end you have to use .ToDictionary` and count is just a variable here to index your results. There are probably better ways than using count variable to index but i don't know rit now.

    – Sumit raj
    Jan 20 at 15:55













  • Sorry, but I don't understand your comment. The count I needed ordering is the x.Count() and not the count var. Don't needed it to be a proper ordered container, but since they are sent to the view in the same order they are inserted to the dict, it's enough. The way you wrote it works wonderfully.

    – João Gomes
    Jan 20 at 16:17











  • It’s ok. If this works for u , then all ok

    – Sumit raj
    Jan 20 at 16:19

















Thanks. Works fine. Only missing the orderby count, but I can do that in the view.

– João Gomes
Jan 20 at 15:15







Thanks. Works fine. Only missing the orderby count, but I can do that in the view.

– João Gomes
Jan 20 at 15:15















An .OrderByDescending(x => x.Count()) bellow the groupby also solves it.

– João Gomes
Jan 20 at 15:51





An .OrderByDescending(x => x.Count()) bellow the groupby also solves it.

– João Gomes
Jan 20 at 15:51













That will be IGrouped items. How in the world is that equivalent to Dictionary<int, Tuple<string, string, int>> newdict. Wtever you do , at the end you have to use .ToDictionary` and count is just a variable here to index your results. There are probably better ways than using count variable to index but i don't know rit now.

– Sumit raj
Jan 20 at 15:55







That will be IGrouped items. How in the world is that equivalent to Dictionary<int, Tuple<string, string, int>> newdict. Wtever you do , at the end you have to use .ToDictionary` and count is just a variable here to index your results. There are probably better ways than using count variable to index but i don't know rit now.

– Sumit raj
Jan 20 at 15:55















Sorry, but I don't understand your comment. The count I needed ordering is the x.Count() and not the count var. Don't needed it to be a proper ordered container, but since they are sent to the view in the same order they are inserted to the dict, it's enough. The way you wrote it works wonderfully.

– João Gomes
Jan 20 at 16:17





Sorry, but I don't understand your comment. The count I needed ordering is the x.Count() and not the count var. Don't needed it to be a proper ordered container, but since they are sent to the view in the same order they are inserted to the dict, it's enough. The way you wrote it works wonderfully.

– João Gomes
Jan 20 at 16:17













It’s ok. If this works for u , then all ok

– Sumit raj
Jan 20 at 16:19





It’s ok. If this works for u , then all ok

– Sumit raj
Jan 20 at 16:19













1














Use GroupBy and then use ToDictionary



testdict
.GroupBy(x => new { x.Value.Item2, x.Value.Item3 })
.Select((x, i) => new {
i,
ShortCode = x.Key.Item2,
ProductName = x.Key.Item3,
Count = x.Count(),
})
.ToDictionary(x => x.i, x => new Tuple<string, string, int>(x.ShortCode, x.ProductName, x.Count));





share|improve this answer


























  • Instead of that First, why don't you GroupBy by the two properties? Then just use Key.Item1 and Key.Item2

    – Camilo Terevinto
    Jan 20 at 14:32











  • Can't quite figure this: error CS0029: Cannot implicitly convert type 'System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary>' to 'System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary>'

    – João Gomes
    Jan 20 at 15:16











  • @CamiloTerevinto, thanks... updated answer accordingly

    – user2321864
    Jan 21 at 8:47
















1














Use GroupBy and then use ToDictionary



testdict
.GroupBy(x => new { x.Value.Item2, x.Value.Item3 })
.Select((x, i) => new {
i,
ShortCode = x.Key.Item2,
ProductName = x.Key.Item3,
Count = x.Count(),
})
.ToDictionary(x => x.i, x => new Tuple<string, string, int>(x.ShortCode, x.ProductName, x.Count));





share|improve this answer


























  • Instead of that First, why don't you GroupBy by the two properties? Then just use Key.Item1 and Key.Item2

    – Camilo Terevinto
    Jan 20 at 14:32











  • Can't quite figure this: error CS0029: Cannot implicitly convert type 'System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary>' to 'System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary>'

    – João Gomes
    Jan 20 at 15:16











  • @CamiloTerevinto, thanks... updated answer accordingly

    – user2321864
    Jan 21 at 8:47














1












1








1







Use GroupBy and then use ToDictionary



testdict
.GroupBy(x => new { x.Value.Item2, x.Value.Item3 })
.Select((x, i) => new {
i,
ShortCode = x.Key.Item2,
ProductName = x.Key.Item3,
Count = x.Count(),
})
.ToDictionary(x => x.i, x => new Tuple<string, string, int>(x.ShortCode, x.ProductName, x.Count));





share|improve this answer















Use GroupBy and then use ToDictionary



testdict
.GroupBy(x => new { x.Value.Item2, x.Value.Item3 })
.Select((x, i) => new {
i,
ShortCode = x.Key.Item2,
ProductName = x.Key.Item3,
Count = x.Count(),
})
.ToDictionary(x => x.i, x => new Tuple<string, string, int>(x.ShortCode, x.ProductName, x.Count));






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Jan 21 at 11:46

























answered Jan 20 at 14:24









user2321864user2321864

1,25341627




1,25341627













  • Instead of that First, why don't you GroupBy by the two properties? Then just use Key.Item1 and Key.Item2

    – Camilo Terevinto
    Jan 20 at 14:32











  • Can't quite figure this: error CS0029: Cannot implicitly convert type 'System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary>' to 'System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary>'

    – João Gomes
    Jan 20 at 15:16











  • @CamiloTerevinto, thanks... updated answer accordingly

    – user2321864
    Jan 21 at 8:47



















  • Instead of that First, why don't you GroupBy by the two properties? Then just use Key.Item1 and Key.Item2

    – Camilo Terevinto
    Jan 20 at 14:32











  • Can't quite figure this: error CS0029: Cannot implicitly convert type 'System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary>' to 'System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary>'

    – João Gomes
    Jan 20 at 15:16











  • @CamiloTerevinto, thanks... updated answer accordingly

    – user2321864
    Jan 21 at 8:47

















Instead of that First, why don't you GroupBy by the two properties? Then just use Key.Item1 and Key.Item2

– Camilo Terevinto
Jan 20 at 14:32





Instead of that First, why don't you GroupBy by the two properties? Then just use Key.Item1 and Key.Item2

– Camilo Terevinto
Jan 20 at 14:32













Can't quite figure this: error CS0029: Cannot implicitly convert type 'System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary>' to 'System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary>'

– João Gomes
Jan 20 at 15:16





Can't quite figure this: error CS0029: Cannot implicitly convert type 'System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary>' to 'System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary>'

– João Gomes
Jan 20 at 15:16













@CamiloTerevinto, thanks... updated answer accordingly

– user2321864
Jan 21 at 8:47





@CamiloTerevinto, thanks... updated answer accordingly

– user2321864
Jan 21 at 8:47


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54277285%2fcreate-new-dictionary-with-group-and-count-based-on-existing-dictionary-with-tup%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Homophylophilia

Updating UILabel text programmatically using a function

Cloud Functions - OpenCV Videocapture Read method fails for larger files from cloud storage