JavaBean Introspection with Optional return types
java.beans.Introspector#getBeanInfo
compiles an incomplete PropertyDescriptor
when changing the getter return type to com.google.common.base.Optional
.
I'm using Java 7 and thus have to use Guava's Optional
. I'd like to use it as return types in my JavaBeans.
I've prepared these two small unit tests to outline the problem:
import static org.junit.Assert.*;
import java.beans.BeanInfo;
import java.beans.IntrospectionException;
import java.beans.Introspector;
import java.beans.PropertyDescriptor;
import org.junit.Test;
import com.google.common.base.Optional;
public class BeanOptionalTest {
class SimpleBean {
private String foo;
public String getFoo() { return foo; }
public void setFoo(String foo) { this.foo = foo; }
}
@Test
public void test_SimpleBean() throws Exception {
assertFooProperty(SimpleBean.class);
}
class OptionalBean {
private String foo;
public Optional<String> getFoo() { return Optional.fromNullable(foo); }
public void setFoo(String foo) { this.foo = foo; }
}
@Test
public void test_OptionalBean() throws Exception {
assertFooProperty(OptionalBean.class);
}
private void assertFooProperty(Class<?> beanClass) throws IntrospectionException {
BeanInfo beanInfo = Introspector.getBeanInfo(beanClass);
assertEquals(2, beanInfo.getPropertyDescriptors().length);
PropertyDescriptor fooDescriptor = beanInfo.getPropertyDescriptors()[1];
assertNotNull(fooDescriptor.getReadMethod());
assertEquals("getFoo", fooDescriptor.getReadMethod().getName());
assertNotNull(fooDescriptor.getWriteMethod());
assertEquals("setFoo", fooDescriptor.getWriteMethod().getName());
}
}
test_OptionalBean
fails because the write method is null
. Presumably the Introspector matches foo to the type Optional
instead of String
.
How can this behaviour be changed in order to receive a complete PropertyDescriptor
despite changing the return type to Optional
?
java javabeans guava optional introspection
add a comment |
java.beans.Introspector#getBeanInfo
compiles an incomplete PropertyDescriptor
when changing the getter return type to com.google.common.base.Optional
.
I'm using Java 7 and thus have to use Guava's Optional
. I'd like to use it as return types in my JavaBeans.
I've prepared these two small unit tests to outline the problem:
import static org.junit.Assert.*;
import java.beans.BeanInfo;
import java.beans.IntrospectionException;
import java.beans.Introspector;
import java.beans.PropertyDescriptor;
import org.junit.Test;
import com.google.common.base.Optional;
public class BeanOptionalTest {
class SimpleBean {
private String foo;
public String getFoo() { return foo; }
public void setFoo(String foo) { this.foo = foo; }
}
@Test
public void test_SimpleBean() throws Exception {
assertFooProperty(SimpleBean.class);
}
class OptionalBean {
private String foo;
public Optional<String> getFoo() { return Optional.fromNullable(foo); }
public void setFoo(String foo) { this.foo = foo; }
}
@Test
public void test_OptionalBean() throws Exception {
assertFooProperty(OptionalBean.class);
}
private void assertFooProperty(Class<?> beanClass) throws IntrospectionException {
BeanInfo beanInfo = Introspector.getBeanInfo(beanClass);
assertEquals(2, beanInfo.getPropertyDescriptors().length);
PropertyDescriptor fooDescriptor = beanInfo.getPropertyDescriptors()[1];
assertNotNull(fooDescriptor.getReadMethod());
assertEquals("getFoo", fooDescriptor.getReadMethod().getName());
assertNotNull(fooDescriptor.getWriteMethod());
assertEquals("setFoo", fooDescriptor.getWriteMethod().getName());
}
}
test_OptionalBean
fails because the write method is null
. Presumably the Introspector matches foo to the type Optional
instead of String
.
How can this behaviour be changed in order to receive a complete PropertyDescriptor
despite changing the return type to Optional
?
java javabeans guava optional introspection
add a comment |
java.beans.Introspector#getBeanInfo
compiles an incomplete PropertyDescriptor
when changing the getter return type to com.google.common.base.Optional
.
I'm using Java 7 and thus have to use Guava's Optional
. I'd like to use it as return types in my JavaBeans.
I've prepared these two small unit tests to outline the problem:
import static org.junit.Assert.*;
import java.beans.BeanInfo;
import java.beans.IntrospectionException;
import java.beans.Introspector;
import java.beans.PropertyDescriptor;
import org.junit.Test;
import com.google.common.base.Optional;
public class BeanOptionalTest {
class SimpleBean {
private String foo;
public String getFoo() { return foo; }
public void setFoo(String foo) { this.foo = foo; }
}
@Test
public void test_SimpleBean() throws Exception {
assertFooProperty(SimpleBean.class);
}
class OptionalBean {
private String foo;
public Optional<String> getFoo() { return Optional.fromNullable(foo); }
public void setFoo(String foo) { this.foo = foo; }
}
@Test
public void test_OptionalBean() throws Exception {
assertFooProperty(OptionalBean.class);
}
private void assertFooProperty(Class<?> beanClass) throws IntrospectionException {
BeanInfo beanInfo = Introspector.getBeanInfo(beanClass);
assertEquals(2, beanInfo.getPropertyDescriptors().length);
PropertyDescriptor fooDescriptor = beanInfo.getPropertyDescriptors()[1];
assertNotNull(fooDescriptor.getReadMethod());
assertEquals("getFoo", fooDescriptor.getReadMethod().getName());
assertNotNull(fooDescriptor.getWriteMethod());
assertEquals("setFoo", fooDescriptor.getWriteMethod().getName());
}
}
test_OptionalBean
fails because the write method is null
. Presumably the Introspector matches foo to the type Optional
instead of String
.
How can this behaviour be changed in order to receive a complete PropertyDescriptor
despite changing the return type to Optional
?
java javabeans guava optional introspection
java.beans.Introspector#getBeanInfo
compiles an incomplete PropertyDescriptor
when changing the getter return type to com.google.common.base.Optional
.
I'm using Java 7 and thus have to use Guava's Optional
. I'd like to use it as return types in my JavaBeans.
I've prepared these two small unit tests to outline the problem:
import static org.junit.Assert.*;
import java.beans.BeanInfo;
import java.beans.IntrospectionException;
import java.beans.Introspector;
import java.beans.PropertyDescriptor;
import org.junit.Test;
import com.google.common.base.Optional;
public class BeanOptionalTest {
class SimpleBean {
private String foo;
public String getFoo() { return foo; }
public void setFoo(String foo) { this.foo = foo; }
}
@Test
public void test_SimpleBean() throws Exception {
assertFooProperty(SimpleBean.class);
}
class OptionalBean {
private String foo;
public Optional<String> getFoo() { return Optional.fromNullable(foo); }
public void setFoo(String foo) { this.foo = foo; }
}
@Test
public void test_OptionalBean() throws Exception {
assertFooProperty(OptionalBean.class);
}
private void assertFooProperty(Class<?> beanClass) throws IntrospectionException {
BeanInfo beanInfo = Introspector.getBeanInfo(beanClass);
assertEquals(2, beanInfo.getPropertyDescriptors().length);
PropertyDescriptor fooDescriptor = beanInfo.getPropertyDescriptors()[1];
assertNotNull(fooDescriptor.getReadMethod());
assertEquals("getFoo", fooDescriptor.getReadMethod().getName());
assertNotNull(fooDescriptor.getWriteMethod());
assertEquals("setFoo", fooDescriptor.getWriteMethod().getName());
}
}
test_OptionalBean
fails because the write method is null
. Presumably the Introspector matches foo to the type Optional
instead of String
.
How can this behaviour be changed in order to receive a complete PropertyDescriptor
despite changing the return type to Optional
?
java javabeans guava optional introspection
java javabeans guava optional introspection
asked Jan 20 at 14:14
MorrowMorrow
89112
89112
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Your test breaks because the type of the parameter of OptionalBean::setFoo
doesn't match the return type of OptionalBean::getFoo
. A PropertyDescriptor
is specific to a type and here, Optional<String>
and String
are not the same type, even if conceptually they are strongly linked.
With the current implementation of JavaBeans, you can't do what you want to do. What you could do is write your own BeanInfo
-like object that does the introspection for you but doesn't implement BeanInfo
.
Thanks very much for your answer. I was hoping for an easier solution or some extension point of the Introspector, but apparently I have to go all the way.
– Morrow
Jan 21 at 15:26
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54277319%2fjavabean-introspection-with-optional-return-types%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Your test breaks because the type of the parameter of OptionalBean::setFoo
doesn't match the return type of OptionalBean::getFoo
. A PropertyDescriptor
is specific to a type and here, Optional<String>
and String
are not the same type, even if conceptually they are strongly linked.
With the current implementation of JavaBeans, you can't do what you want to do. What you could do is write your own BeanInfo
-like object that does the introspection for you but doesn't implement BeanInfo
.
Thanks very much for your answer. I was hoping for an easier solution or some extension point of the Introspector, but apparently I have to go all the way.
– Morrow
Jan 21 at 15:26
add a comment |
Your test breaks because the type of the parameter of OptionalBean::setFoo
doesn't match the return type of OptionalBean::getFoo
. A PropertyDescriptor
is specific to a type and here, Optional<String>
and String
are not the same type, even if conceptually they are strongly linked.
With the current implementation of JavaBeans, you can't do what you want to do. What you could do is write your own BeanInfo
-like object that does the introspection for you but doesn't implement BeanInfo
.
Thanks very much for your answer. I was hoping for an easier solution or some extension point of the Introspector, but apparently I have to go all the way.
– Morrow
Jan 21 at 15:26
add a comment |
Your test breaks because the type of the parameter of OptionalBean::setFoo
doesn't match the return type of OptionalBean::getFoo
. A PropertyDescriptor
is specific to a type and here, Optional<String>
and String
are not the same type, even if conceptually they are strongly linked.
With the current implementation of JavaBeans, you can't do what you want to do. What you could do is write your own BeanInfo
-like object that does the introspection for you but doesn't implement BeanInfo
.
Your test breaks because the type of the parameter of OptionalBean::setFoo
doesn't match the return type of OptionalBean::getFoo
. A PropertyDescriptor
is specific to a type and here, Optional<String>
and String
are not the same type, even if conceptually they are strongly linked.
With the current implementation of JavaBeans, you can't do what you want to do. What you could do is write your own BeanInfo
-like object that does the introspection for you but doesn't implement BeanInfo
.
answered Jan 21 at 9:05
Olivier GrégoireOlivier Grégoire
15.2k1663104
15.2k1663104
Thanks very much for your answer. I was hoping for an easier solution or some extension point of the Introspector, but apparently I have to go all the way.
– Morrow
Jan 21 at 15:26
add a comment |
Thanks very much for your answer. I was hoping for an easier solution or some extension point of the Introspector, but apparently I have to go all the way.
– Morrow
Jan 21 at 15:26
Thanks very much for your answer. I was hoping for an easier solution or some extension point of the Introspector, but apparently I have to go all the way.
– Morrow
Jan 21 at 15:26
Thanks very much for your answer. I was hoping for an easier solution or some extension point of the Introspector, but apparently I have to go all the way.
– Morrow
Jan 21 at 15:26
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54277319%2fjavabean-introspection-with-optional-return-types%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown