Django unit testing: Separating unit tests without querying the database multiple times
I have a pair of tests like this:
Make sure a task's deletion status initializes as None
def test_initial_task_deletion_status_is_none(self):
unfinished_task = Task.objects.get(tasked_with="Unfinished Test")
self.assertIsNone(unfinished_task.delete_status)
# Make sure a task's deletion status changes appropriately
def test_unfinished_task_deletion_status_updates_appropriately(self):
unfinished_task = Task.objects.get(tasked_with="Unfinished Test")
unfinished_task.timed_delete(delta=.1)
self.assertIs(unfinished_task.delete_status, "Marked for Deletion")
This will go on, but I'll have unfinished_task = Task.objects.get(tasked_with="Unfinished Test") at the beginning of every one. Is there a way to split these types of things into separate tests, but use the same query result?
django unit-testing
asked Jan 17 at 18:54
AmagicalFishyAmagicalFishy
380113
add a comment |
I have a pair of tests like this:
Make sure a task's deletion status initializes as None
def test_initial_task_deletion_status_is_none(self):
unfinished_task = Task.objects.get(tasked_with="Unfinished Test")
self.assertIsNone(unfinished_task.delete_status)
# Make sure a task's deletion status changes appropriately
def test_unfinished_task_deletion_status_updates_appropriately(self):
unfinished_task = Task.objects.get(tasked_with="Unfinished Test")
unfinished_task.timed_delete(delta=.1)
self.assertIs(unfinished_task.delete_status, "Marked for Deletion")
This will go on, but I'll have unfinished_task = Task.objects.get(tasked_with="Unfinished Test") at the beginning of every one. Is there a way to split these types of things into separate tests, but use the same query result?
django unit-testing
asked Jan 17 at 18:54
AmagicalFishyAmagicalFishy
380113
No you can't, because the database is destroyed and recreated for each test anyway. You can put the query intosetUpand assign the result to an instance variable, but it'll still be executed each time.
– Daniel Roseman
Jan 17 at 19:15
add a comment |
I have a pair of tests like this:
Make sure a task's deletion status initializes as None
def test_initial_task_deletion_status_is_none(self):
unfinished_task = Task.objects.get(tasked_with="Unfinished Test")
self.assertIsNone(unfinished_task.delete_status)
# Make sure a task's deletion status changes appropriately
def test_unfinished_task_deletion_status_updates_appropriately(self):
unfinished_task = Task.objects.get(tasked_with="Unfinished Test")
unfinished_task.timed_delete(delta=.1)
self.assertIs(unfinished_task.delete_status, "Marked for Deletion")
This will go on, but I'll have unfinished_task = Task.objects.get(tasked_with="Unfinished Test") at the beginning of every one. Is there a way to split these types of things into separate tests, but use the same query result?
django unit-testing
asked Jan 17 at 18:54
AmagicalFishyAmagicalFishy
380113
I have a pair of tests like this:
Make sure a task's deletion status initializes as None
def test_initial_task_deletion_status_is_none(self):
unfinished_task = Task.objects.get(tasked_with="Unfinished Test")
self.assertIsNone(unfinished_task.delete_status)
# Make sure a task's deletion status changes appropriately
def test_unfinished_task_deletion_status_updates_appropriately(self):
unfinished_task = Task.objects.get(tasked_with="Unfinished Test")
unfinished_task.timed_delete(delta=.1)
self.assertIs(unfinished_task.delete_status, "Marked for Deletion")
This will go on, but I'll have unfinished_task = Task.objects.get(tasked_with="Unfinished Test") at the beginning of every one. Is there a way to split these types of things into separate tests, but use the same query result?
django unit-testing
django unit-testing
asked Jan 17 at 18:54
AmagicalFishyAmagicalFishy
380113
asked Jan 17 at 18:54
AmagicalFishyAmagicalFishy
380113
asked Jan 17 at 18:54
AmagicalFishyAmagicalFishy
380113
asked Jan 17 at 18:54
AmagicalFishyAmagicalFishy
380113
asked Jan 17 at 18:54
AmagicalFishyAmagicalFishy
380113
380113
No you can't, because the database is destroyed and recreated for each test anyway. You can put the query intosetUpand assign the result to an instance variable, but it'll still be executed each time.
– Daniel Roseman
Jan 17 at 19:15
add a comment |
No you can't, because the database is destroyed and recreated for each test anyway. You can put the query intosetUpand assign the result to an instance variable, but it'll still be executed each time.
– Daniel Roseman
Jan 17 at 19:15
No you can't, because the database is destroyed and recreated for each test anyway. You can put the query into
setUp and assign the result to an instance variable, but it'll still be executed each time.– Daniel Roseman
Jan 17 at 19:15
No you can't, because the database is destroyed and recreated for each test anyway. You can put the query into
setUp and assign the result to an instance variable, but it'll still be executed each time.– Daniel Roseman
Jan 17 at 19:15
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Assuming you're using Django's testing framework, then you can do this using setUp().
More about unittest.TestCase.setUp() here
So your updated snippet would look like:
from django.test import TestCase
class MyTestCase(TestCase):
def setUp(self):
self.unfinished_task = Task.objects.get(tasked_with="Unfinished Test")
def test_initial_task_deletion_status_is_none(self):
self.assertIsNone(self.unfinished_task.delete_status)
# Make sure a task's deletion status changes appropriately
def test_unfinished_task_deletion_status_updates_appropriately(self):
self.unfinished_task.timed_delete(delta=.1)
self.assertIs(self.unfinished_task.delete_status, "Marked for Deletion")
answered Jan 17 at 20:09
dhuidhui
34227
add a comment |
You can place the repeated line in the setUp method, and that will make your code less repetitive, but as DanielRoseman pointed out, it will still be run for each test, so you won't be using the same query result.
You can place it in the setUpTestData method, and it will be run only once, before all the tests in MyTestCase, but then your unfinished_task object will be a class variable, shared across all the tests. In-memory modifications made to the object during one test will carry over into subsequent tests, and that is not what you want.
In read-only tests, using setUpTestData is a good way to cut out unnecessary queries, but if you're going to be modifying the objects, you'll want to start fresh each time.
answered Jan 19 at 6:12
Daniel HawkinsDaniel Hawkins
867910
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54242511%2fdjango-unit-testing-separating-unit-tests-without-querying-the-database-multipl%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Assuming you're using Django's testing framework, then you can do this using setUp().
More about unittest.TestCase.setUp() here
So your updated snippet would look like:
from django.test import TestCase
class MyTestCase(TestCase):
def setUp(self):
self.unfinished_task = Task.objects.get(tasked_with="Unfinished Test")
def test_initial_task_deletion_status_is_none(self):
self.assertIsNone(self.unfinished_task.delete_status)
# Make sure a task's deletion status changes appropriately
def test_unfinished_task_deletion_status_updates_appropriately(self):
self.unfinished_task.timed_delete(delta=.1)
self.assertIs(self.unfinished_task.delete_status, "Marked for Deletion")
answered Jan 17 at 20:09
dhuidhui
34227
add a comment |
Assuming you're using Django's testing framework, then you can do this using setUp().
More about unittest.TestCase.setUp() here
So your updated snippet would look like:
from django.test import TestCase
class MyTestCase(TestCase):
def setUp(self):
self.unfinished_task = Task.objects.get(tasked_with="Unfinished Test")
def test_initial_task_deletion_status_is_none(self):
self.assertIsNone(self.unfinished_task.delete_status)
# Make sure a task's deletion status changes appropriately
def test_unfinished_task_deletion_status_updates_appropriately(self):
self.unfinished_task.timed_delete(delta=.1)
self.assertIs(self.unfinished_task.delete_status, "Marked for Deletion")
answered Jan 17 at 20:09
dhuidhui
34227
add a comment |
Assuming you're using Django's testing framework, then you can do this using setUp().
More about unittest.TestCase.setUp() here
So your updated snippet would look like:
from django.test import TestCase
class MyTestCase(TestCase):
def setUp(self):
self.unfinished_task = Task.objects.get(tasked_with="Unfinished Test")
def test_initial_task_deletion_status_is_none(self):
self.assertIsNone(self.unfinished_task.delete_status)
# Make sure a task's deletion status changes appropriately
def test_unfinished_task_deletion_status_updates_appropriately(self):
self.unfinished_task.timed_delete(delta=.1)
self.assertIs(self.unfinished_task.delete_status, "Marked for Deletion")
answered Jan 17 at 20:09
dhuidhui
34227
Assuming you're using Django's testing framework, then you can do this using setUp().
More about unittest.TestCase.setUp() here
So your updated snippet would look like:
from django.test import TestCase
class MyTestCase(TestCase):
def setUp(self):
self.unfinished_task = Task.objects.get(tasked_with="Unfinished Test")
def test_initial_task_deletion_status_is_none(self):
self.assertIsNone(self.unfinished_task.delete_status)
# Make sure a task's deletion status changes appropriately
def test_unfinished_task_deletion_status_updates_appropriately(self):
self.unfinished_task.timed_delete(delta=.1)
self.assertIs(self.unfinished_task.delete_status, "Marked for Deletion")
answered Jan 17 at 20:09
dhuidhui
34227
answered Jan 17 at 20:09
dhuidhui
34227
answered Jan 17 at 20:09
dhuidhui
34227
answered Jan 17 at 20:09
dhuidhui
34227
34227
add a comment |
add a comment |
You can place the repeated line in the setUp method, and that will make your code less repetitive, but as DanielRoseman pointed out, it will still be run for each test, so you won't be using the same query result.
You can place it in the setUpTestData method, and it will be run only once, before all the tests in MyTestCase, but then your unfinished_task object will be a class variable, shared across all the tests. In-memory modifications made to the object during one test will carry over into subsequent tests, and that is not what you want.
In read-only tests, using setUpTestData is a good way to cut out unnecessary queries, but if you're going to be modifying the objects, you'll want to start fresh each time.
answered Jan 19 at 6:12
Daniel HawkinsDaniel Hawkins
867910
add a comment |
You can place the repeated line in the setUp method, and that will make your code less repetitive, but as DanielRoseman pointed out, it will still be run for each test, so you won't be using the same query result.
You can place it in the setUpTestData method, and it will be run only once, before all the tests in MyTestCase, but then your unfinished_task object will be a class variable, shared across all the tests. In-memory modifications made to the object during one test will carry over into subsequent tests, and that is not what you want.
In read-only tests, using setUpTestData is a good way to cut out unnecessary queries, but if you're going to be modifying the objects, you'll want to start fresh each time.
answered Jan 19 at 6:12
Daniel HawkinsDaniel Hawkins
867910
add a comment |
You can place the repeated line in the setUp method, and that will make your code less repetitive, but as DanielRoseman pointed out, it will still be run for each test, so you won't be using the same query result.
You can place it in the setUpTestData method, and it will be run only once, before all the tests in MyTestCase, but then your unfinished_task object will be a class variable, shared across all the tests. In-memory modifications made to the object during one test will carry over into subsequent tests, and that is not what you want.
In read-only tests, using setUpTestData is a good way to cut out unnecessary queries, but if you're going to be modifying the objects, you'll want to start fresh each time.
answered Jan 19 at 6:12
Daniel HawkinsDaniel Hawkins
867910
You can place the repeated line in the setUp method, and that will make your code less repetitive, but as DanielRoseman pointed out, it will still be run for each test, so you won't be using the same query result.
You can place it in the setUpTestData method, and it will be run only once, before all the tests in MyTestCase, but then your unfinished_task object will be a class variable, shared across all the tests. In-memory modifications made to the object during one test will carry over into subsequent tests, and that is not what you want.
In read-only tests, using setUpTestData is a good way to cut out unnecessary queries, but if you're going to be modifying the objects, you'll want to start fresh each time.
answered Jan 19 at 6:12
Daniel HawkinsDaniel Hawkins
867910
answered Jan 19 at 6:12
Daniel HawkinsDaniel Hawkins
867910
answered Jan 19 at 6:12
Daniel HawkinsDaniel Hawkins
867910
answered Jan 19 at 6:12
Daniel HawkinsDaniel Hawkins
867910
867910
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54242511%2fdjango-unit-testing-separating-unit-tests-without-querying-the-database-multipl%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
No you can't, because the database is destroyed and recreated for each test anyway. You can put the query into
setUpand assign the result to an instance variable, but it'll still be executed each time.– Daniel Roseman
Jan 17 at 19:15